Difference between revisions of "Essay:Sources and references"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by BlakeJ (talk) to last revision by JessicaT)
m (→‎top: Default Sort)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
 
the article more trustworthy. But also because it gives the reader a
 
the article more trustworthy. But also because it gives the reader a
 
hint of where to go for more information.
 
hint of where to go for more information.
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Sources and references}}

Latest revision as of 20:14, March 27, 2017

! This Is An Original Work.
This Essay is an original work which represents the views of its author or authors and does not necessarily represent the views of Conservapedia or its management.
Conservlogo.png

We want to provide a trustworthy encyclopedia. It's a good idea to let the reader know where we got the information, so they can decide how reliable that source is. NASA is a good source for astronomy and space travel. The United Nations may or may not be a reliable source of economic, political or scientific data.

Also, as a matter of scholarly ethics, the academic community considers it important to be open about how much of any work you wrote yourself, and how much you copied from others; see plagiarism.

Whatever federal information the U.S. government creates and releases into the public domain is really our stuff (as taxpayers). There is no law requiring credit to be given for copying public domain writing; by definition it is "ownerless" (public) property.

However, it is usually a good service to our readers, if we cite the agency and/or author of public domain works. If only because it makes the article more trustworthy. But also because it gives the reader a hint of where to go for more information.