Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikimedia Commons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→"Wikimedia Commons as a massive amateur porn hub": new section) |
NeilWalker (talk | contribs) (fixed?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hi,<br /> | Hi,<br /> | ||
This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I've made an edit which I believe improves it without removing the thrust of the original text. [[User:NeilWalker|NeilWalker]] ([[User talk:NeilWalker|talk]]) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:08, September 1, 2017
"Wikimedia Commons as a massive amateur porn hub"
Hi,
This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --David B (TALK) 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
- I've made an edit which I believe improves it without removing the thrust of the original text. NeilWalker (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (EDT)