Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikimedia Commons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
NeilWalker (talk | contribs) (fixed?) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
:I've made an edit which I believe improves it without removing the thrust of the original text. [[User:NeilWalker|NeilWalker]] ([[User talk:NeilWalker|talk]]) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | :I've made an edit which I believe improves it without removing the thrust of the original text. [[User:NeilWalker|NeilWalker]] ([[User talk:NeilWalker|talk]]) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::By the way, David, when you changed the wording, part of the wording you changed was part of a quote: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Commons&curid=126816&diff=1370573&oldid=1370548] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 10:12, 1 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:12, September 1, 2017
"Wikimedia Commons as a massive amateur porn hub"
Hi,
This problem probably is worth mentioning, but may I suggest we take a much less "in-your-face" approach to it, even if they don't? CP is supposed to by family-friendly, so it doesn't seem to me like in-depth descriptions and suggested search terms are a good idea. Any thoughts? --David B (TALK) 09:52, 1 September 2017 (EDT)
- I've made an edit which I believe improves it without removing the thrust of the original text. NeilWalker (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2017 (EDT)