Difference between revisions of "Reiteration"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (minor revision - moved Witnessing to end of paragraph re Christian apologetics - added "and Evangelism",)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The word is from ''re-'' again + ''iterate'', [[Latin]] ''iteratus'', past participle of ''iterare'' to repeat—''to reiterate'' is literally to repeat again and again, over and over, repeatedly.
 
The word is from ''re-'' again + ''iterate'', [[Latin]] ''iteratus'', past participle of ''iterare'' to repeat—''to reiterate'' is literally to repeat again and again, over and over, repeatedly.
  
−
[[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]], preachers, and missionaries, primarily task themselves with a mission to reiterate the truths of God's revelation of Himself in the work of salvation by the incarnation, ministry, death, resurrection and ascension of [[Jesus Christ]], and in demonstrations of the truth and accuracy of the [[Bible]], and validity of [[Christianity|Christian]] [[worship]].
+
[[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]], preachers, and missionaries, primarily task themselves with a mission to reiterate the truths of God's revelation of Himself in the work of salvation by the incarnation, ministry, death, resurrection and ascension of [[Jesus Christ]], and in demonstrations of the truth and accuracy of the [[Bible]], and validity of [[Christianity|Christian]] [[worship]]. See [[Witnessing]] and [[Evangelism]].
  
−
Reiteration improperly used is tedious and tendentious, often having the opposite of the intended effect of clarification and persuasion by wearying the audience; for example, in exhaustive repetition of [[advertising]], and, in particular, political [[campaign]] ads to the point of [[antipathy]] and [[Disgusting|disgust]]. See [[Witnessing]] and [[Harassment]].
+
Reiteration improperly used is tedious and tendentious, often having the opposite of the intended effect of clarification and persuasion by wearying the audience; for example, in exhaustive repetition of [[advertising]], and, in particular, political [[campaign]] ads to the point of [[antipathy]] and [[Disgusting|disgust]]. See [[Harassment]].
  
 
Reiteration is a common element in [[propaganda]], especially in claims made against Christian doctrine and worship. See [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|Fallacy of assertion]] and [[Brainwashing]]. Compare [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] and [[Confirmation bias]].
 
Reiteration is a common element in [[propaganda]], especially in claims made against Christian doctrine and worship. See [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|Fallacy of assertion]] and [[Brainwashing]]. Compare [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] and [[Confirmation bias]].

Revision as of 21:23, November 19, 2018

Reiteration is a literary and rhetorical device of repetition, often used in methods of pedagogy, in jurisprudence, law and politics, and in "preachology", for emphasis and for effect; to reiterate is merely to repeat. It is a tool which can be used to good or bad effect.

The word is from re- again + iterate, Latin iteratus, past participle of iterare to repeat—to reiterate is literally to repeat again and again, over and over, repeatedly.

Christian apologists, preachers, and missionaries, primarily task themselves with a mission to reiterate the truths of God's revelation of Himself in the work of salvation by the incarnation, ministry, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ, and in demonstrations of the truth and accuracy of the Bible, and validity of Christian worship. See Witnessing and Evangelism.

Reiteration improperly used is tedious and tendentious, often having the opposite of the intended effect of clarification and persuasion by wearying the audience; for example, in exhaustive repetition of advertising, and, in particular, political campaign ads to the point of antipathy and disgust. See Harassment.

Reiteration is a common element in propaganda, especially in claims made against Christian doctrine and worship. See Fallacy of assertion and Brainwashing. Compare Fallacy of invincible ignorance and Confirmation bias.