Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Tnavbar"
From Conservapedia
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
IMO this should be shortened to include only the link back to the template, not to its talk-page or its edite-option. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 12:31, August 9, 2021 (EDT) | IMO this should be shortened to include only the link back to the template, not to its talk-page or its edite-option. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 12:31, August 9, 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Well, leaving a link to the editing option is fine, because it's not in the <nowiki>[[]]</nowiki> fashion (it's actually impossible to directly link to an article's "action=edit" on normal pages), and thus won't be tracked in the CP database in terms of which page links to where. I do agree that the link to the template's talk page should be removed. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Monday, 12:36, August 9, 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:36, August 9, 2021
I recommend a minor change to help this look a little nicer. Before [{{fullurl: put <span class="plainlinks"> and after </span>] put </span>; that will remove the little arrow icon that makes the edit link look like an external link. ~ Webster (talk) 00:37, 8 May 2013 (EDT)
IMO this should be shortened to include only the link back to the template, not to its talk-page or its edite-option. --AugustO (talk) 12:31, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
- Well, leaving a link to the editing option is fine, because it's not in the [[]] fashion (it's actually impossible to directly link to an article's "action=edit" on normal pages), and thus won't be tracked in the CP database in terms of which page links to where. I do agree that the link to the template's talk page should be removed. —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Monday, 12:36, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
