Changes

*Southland Sec. Corp. v. INSpire Ins. Sols. Inc., 365 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2004)  

*Southland Sec. Corp. v. INSpire Ins. Sols. Inc., 365 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2004)  

*''Taylor Publ’g Co. v. Jostens Inc.'', 216 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 2000) (an [[antitrust]] decision defining exclusionary conduct as something “inconsistent with competition on the merits” which has a “potential for making a significant contribution to monopoly power”)

*''Taylor Publ’g Co. v. Jostens Inc.'', 216 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 2000) (an [[antitrust]] decision defining exclusionary conduct as something “inconsistent with competition on the merits” which has a “potential for making a significant contribution to monopoly power”)

*Anago, Inc. v. Tecnol Med. Prods., 976 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1992) (antitrust law prohibits restraining trade by harming other

*Anago, Inc. v. Tecnol Med. Prods., 976 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1992) (antitrust law prohibits restraining trade by harming other competitors)

competitors)

*Norris v. Hearst Tr., 500 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2007)  

*Norris v. Hearst Tr., 500 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2007)  

*Ginzburg v. Mem’l Healthcare Sys., 993 F. Supp. 998 (S.D. Tex. 1997)  

*Ginzburg v. Mem’l Healthcare Sys., 993 F. Supp. 998 (S.D. Tex. 1997)