Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Russian oil: Lower future production/profits due to future higher extraction costs and other inefficiencies"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Stratfor]], hmmm? You need to see this: [https://rumble.com/v4fprbr-mel-k-and-gary-kah-resisting-the-globalist-conditioning-of-america-2-25-24.html Resisting the globalist conditioning of America] and get off your Neocon/LGBT donkey. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 22:44, February 25, 2024 (EST)
 
[[Stratfor]], hmmm? You need to see this: [https://rumble.com/v4fprbr-mel-k-and-gary-kah-resisting-the-globalist-conditioning-of-america-2-25-24.html Resisting the globalist conditioning of America] and get off your Neocon/LGBT donkey. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 22:44, February 25, 2024 (EST)
  
−
:Regarding you ignoring my OilPrice.com info: See: [[Fallacy of exclusion]]
+
:Regarding you ignoring my OilPrice.com info: The [[Fallacy of exclusion]] is a logical fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence.'"
  
 
:Regarding your Statfor comment. See: [[Genetic fallacy]]
 
:Regarding your Statfor comment. See: [[Genetic fallacy]]
  
 
:I trust this clarifies matters. Feel free to engage in [[last wordism]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:50, February 25, 2024 (EST)
 
:I trust this clarifies matters. Feel free to engage in [[last wordism]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:50, February 25, 2024 (EST)

Revision as of 03:51, February 26, 2024

Stratfor, hmmm? You need to see this: Resisting the globalist conditioning of America and get off your Neocon/LGBT donkey. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 22:44, February 25, 2024 (EST)

Regarding you ignoring my OilPrice.com info: The Fallacy of exclusion is a logical fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence.'"
Regarding your Statfor comment. See: Genetic fallacy
I trust this clarifies matters. Feel free to engage in last wordism. Conservative (talk) 22:50, February 25, 2024 (EST)