Difference between revisions of "Transgender petitions for cert"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Rephrasing) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Transgender petitions for cert''' to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] have been repeatedly denied as Justices dodge and avoid the [[transgender]] | + | '''Transgender petitions for cert''' to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] have been repeatedly denied as Justices dodge and avoid the [[transgender]] craze that was caused by their some of their own decision, notably in ''[[Bostock v. Clayton County]]''. |
These include cases from [[Kentucky]] and [[Tennessee]] that have been redistributed 11 times (as of June 4, 2024) for consideration at conferences within the Court. They are ''[[L.W. v. Skrmetti]]'', No. 23-466, and ''U.S. v. Skrmetti'', No. 23-477, and ''Jane Doe 1 v. Kentucky ex rel. Coleman, Attorney General'', No. 23-492.<ref>https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-492.html</ref> | These include cases from [[Kentucky]] and [[Tennessee]] that have been redistributed 11 times (as of June 4, 2024) for consideration at conferences within the Court. They are ''[[L.W. v. Skrmetti]]'', No. 23-466, and ''U.S. v. Skrmetti'', No. 23-477, and ''Jane Doe 1 v. Kentucky ex rel. Coleman, Attorney General'', No. 23-492.<ref>https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-492.html</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:16, September 13, 2026
Transgender petitions for cert to the U.S. Supreme Court have been repeatedly denied as Justices dodge and avoid the transgender craze that was caused by their some of their own decision, notably in Bostock v. Clayton County.
These include cases from Kentucky and Tennessee that have been redistributed 11 times (as of June 4, 2024) for consideration at conferences within the Court. They are L.W. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-466, and U.S. v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477, and Jane Doe 1 v. Kentucky ex rel. Coleman, Attorney General, No. 23-492.[1]