Difference between revisions of "Talk:Strom Thurmond"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: *Can we get rid of the show-boating wiki quotes? And it is germain the woman was black, how? You cannot judge an affair of a young boy by later actions. The addition of race is merely b...)
 
(comment)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*Can we get rid of the show-boating wiki quotes?  And it is germain the woman was black, how?  You cannot judge an affair of a young boy by later actions.  The addition of race is merely baiting. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 18:38, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
 
*Can we get rid of the show-boating wiki quotes?  And it is germain the woman was black, how?  You cannot judge an affair of a young boy by later actions.  The addition of race is merely baiting. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 18:38, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
:*Yes indeed.  If for example, we were to allow "While this relationship was not illegal, many feel that it is morally wrong" in the [[Jesse Jackson]] article about his out of wedlock child (which incidentally, unlike Thurmond, occured ''while'' he was married to another woman) we'd be accused of all sorts of things.  In fact, I don't think there is any reference at all to that bit of [[liberal hypocrisy]], and probably precisely because of the fear that all sorts of [[hate speech]] would be leveled at conservatives.
 +
::What's more, as [[Hillary Clinton]] said, "It's just sex," and "what a person does in thier private life is no bodies business."  I really think we are approaching the level of undue weight.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 19:08, 15 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:08, August 15, 2007

  • Can we get rid of the show-boating wiki quotes? And it is germain the woman was black, how? You cannot judge an affair of a young boy by later actions. The addition of race is merely baiting. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 18:38, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
  • Yes indeed. If for example, we were to allow "While this relationship was not illegal, many feel that it is morally wrong" in the Jesse Jackson article about his out of wedlock child (which incidentally, unlike Thurmond, occured while he was married to another woman) we'd be accused of all sorts of things. In fact, I don't think there is any reference at all to that bit of liberal hypocrisy, and probably precisely because of the fear that all sorts of hate speech would be leveled at conservatives.
What's more, as Hillary Clinton said, "It's just sex," and "what a person does in thier private life is no bodies business." I really think we are approaching the level of undue weight. Rob Smith 19:08, 15 August 2007 (EDT)