Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 17:06, August 20, 2007

602 bytes added , 17:06, August 20, 2007

some new points about to be added to list

Line 314: Line 314:

Recent software Wikiscanner has found that many interested parties have edited their own Wikipedia articles and not been caught. See [http://computerworld.com/blogs/node/6052] [http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/08/19/business/wiki.php] [http://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/wikipedia-and-the-art-of-censorship-1062639.html] [http://www.itwire.com/content/view/14054/53/]. Even the liberals happy about this [http://uruknet.info/?p=m35491&s1=h1]!

+

== Planning to add a few new examples ==

+

It's about time to add a few new examples to the list here. Please make suggestions here. A point about the new attorney, apparently liberal, who has taken the helm is appropriate, and his callous attitude towards the smears and gossips (while editing his own entry). Another point about the anti-Christian entries is needed. An update about how the leadership of Wikipedia is trying to cash in on the traffic with their for-profit search engine may be appropriate. Other suggestions? Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:06, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,527

edits