Difference between revisions of "Fred Hoyle"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*He was best known for his seminal contributions to the theory of the structure of [[star]]s and on the origin of the chemical elements in stars. He was a joint proponent of the [[Steady-State]] model of the Universe. | *He was best known for his seminal contributions to the theory of the structure of [[star]]s and on the origin of the chemical elements in stars. He was a joint proponent of the [[Steady-State]] model of the Universe. | ||
| − | In an obvious punishment of Fred Hoyle, the [[Nobel Prize]] was awarded to underlings for Fred Hoyle's work. This prize was awarded at a time when Fred Hoyle was uncovering how the [[ | + | In an obvious punishment of Fred Hoyle, the [[Nobel Prize]] was awarded to underlings for Fred Hoyle's work. This prize was awarded at a time when Fred Hoyle was uncovering how the [[Archaeopteryx]] maintained by the British Museum of History is a fraud. |
[http://www.cf.ac.uk/maths/wickramasinghe/hoyle.html] | [http://www.cf.ac.uk/maths/wickramasinghe/hoyle.html] | ||
Revision as of 02:49, November 8, 2007
Fred Hoyle (1915-2001) was a British astronomer noted for his rejection of naturalistic theories of how the universe came into being. Nobel Prize winner Fowler wrote: "Fred Hoyle was the second great influence in my life. The grand concept of nucleosynthesis in stars was first definitely established by Hoyle in 1946." [1] During a radio lecture, he coined the term "big bang" to label the theory (which he disbelieved) that the universe began from an explosion.
- He was best known for his seminal contributions to the theory of the structure of stars and on the origin of the chemical elements in stars. He was a joint proponent of the Steady-State model of the Universe.
In an obvious punishment of Fred Hoyle, the Nobel Prize was awarded to underlings for Fred Hoyle's work. This prize was awarded at a time when Fred Hoyle was uncovering how the Archaeopteryx maintained by the British Museum of History is a fraud. [2]