Difference between revisions of "User:RobSmith"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"We're trying to achieve access for every person on the planet to
the sum total of human knowledge - minus all the garbage".
RobS
(reply re: MississippiMud) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Rob, I don't know all the details of the issue over the Whittaker Chambers issue, but you have authority as admin to resolve issues in favor of the facts. If the conflict persists and locking (protecting) the page becomes necessary as a last resort, then so be it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | Rob, I don't know all the details of the issue over the Whittaker Chambers issue, but you have authority as admin to resolve issues in favor of the facts. If the conflict persists and locking (protecting) the page becomes necessary as a last resort, then so be it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : AmesG is a bright liberal. What can I say. I've been trying to persuade him and still am. Part of the purpose of this site is to engage the other side. Feel free to change his edits and debate with him, but we would not block him (actually, I guess I did once, but then restored him and am glad I did). | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Please block MississippiMud, and for infinite duration, if you feel he's a vandal. His name does suggest possible racism, perhaps in a liberal attempt to for smear tactics. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:17, 14 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:17, March 14, 2007
the sum total of human knowledge - minus all the garbage".
Useful stuff
Rob, I don't know all the details of the issue over the Whittaker Chambers issue, but you have authority as admin to resolve issues in favor of the facts. If the conflict persists and locking (protecting) the page becomes necessary as a last resort, then so be it.--Aschlafly 16:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- AmesG is a bright liberal. What can I say. I've been trying to persuade him and still am. Part of the purpose of this site is to engage the other side. Feel free to change his edits and debate with him, but we would not block him (actually, I guess I did once, but then restored him and am glad I did).
- Please block MississippiMud, and for infinite duration, if you feel he's a vandal. His name does suggest possible racism, perhaps in a liberal attempt to for smear tactics. Thanks.--Aschlafly 12:17, 14 March 2007 (EDT)