Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jeffsang"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Not sarcastic or silly, but meant honestly, however, it's a very liberal POV)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Sarcastic or silly edits will result in a removal from the site.  Please refrain from doing so.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:17, 19 December 2007 (EST)
 
Sarcastic or silly edits will result in a removal from the site.  Please refrain from doing so.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:17, 19 December 2007 (EST)
  
−
:While reviewing his edit, it was in complete earnest, and not a sarcastic or silly edit, quoting a liberal source as a reference should simply be not allowed.
+
:While reviewing his edit, it was in complete earnest, and not a sarcastic or silly edit, quoting a liberal source as a reference should simply be not allowed. {{unsigned|Puellanivis}}
 +
 
 +
::I agree that the edit wasn't sarcastic or silly. (Though I hope Peullanavis' comment about disallowing liberal sources was...) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:49, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 19:49, December 19, 2007

Sarcastic or silly edits will result in a removal from the site. Please refrain from doing so. Karajou 14:17, 19 December 2007 (EST)

While reviewing his edit, it was in complete earnest, and not a sarcastic or silly edit, quoting a liberal source as a reference should simply be not allowed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Puellanivis (talk)
I agree that the edit wasn't sarcastic or silly. (Though I hope Peullanavis' comment about disallowing liberal sources was...) HelpJazz 14:49, 19 December 2007 (EST)