Difference between revisions of "Pascal's wager"
(Undo revision 343460 by Special:Contributions/Qwertguy (User talk:Qwertguy) -- Try talk first) |
(See comment on talk page) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#If God does exist and you do believe in God, you will receive an eternity in heaven; infinite gain. | #If God does exist and you do believe in God, you will receive an eternity in heaven; infinite gain. | ||
| − | [[Blaise Pascal]] reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in God since the potentially infinite gains and losses which occur if God exists outweigh outweigh any possible loss in a finite situation if God does not exist. This is true regardless of what probability one assigns to God's existence as long as some possibility is assigned. Pascal's wager as Pascal stated it is flawed within the context of [[Christianity]], because based upon Christian theology, mere belief in God does not ensure salvation. | + | [[Blaise Pascal]] reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in God since the potentially infinite gains and losses which occur if God exists outweigh outweigh any possible loss in a finite situation if God does not exist. This is true regardless of what probability one assigns to God's existence as long as some possibility is assigned.{{fact}} Pascal's wager as Pascal stated it is flawed within the context of [[Christianity]], because based upon Christian theology, mere belief in God does not ensure salvation. |
Pascal's wager is also not geared for multiple competing god scenarios where various forms or selections of gods are given they may be mutually or partially exclusive. | Pascal's wager is also not geared for multiple competing god scenarios where various forms or selections of gods are given they may be mutually or partially exclusive. | ||
Revision as of 19:03, January 25, 2008
Pascal's Wager is a philosophical proposition which takes the following form:
God either exists or not.
- If God does not exist and you do not not believe in God, you gain nothing and lose nothing.
- If God does exist and you do not believe in God, you are condemned to hell for eternity; infinite loss.
- If God does not exist and you do believe in God, you gain nothing and lose nothing.
- If God does exist and you do believe in God, you will receive an eternity in heaven; infinite gain.
Blaise Pascal reasoned that, given the relative gains and losses for each scenario, the only sensible course for a rational human being was to believe in God since the potentially infinite gains and losses which occur if God exists outweigh outweigh any possible loss in a finite situation if God does not exist. This is true regardless of what probability one assigns to God's existence as long as some possibility is assigned.[Citation Needed] Pascal's wager as Pascal stated it is flawed within the context of Christianity, because based upon Christian theology, mere belief in God does not ensure salvation.
Pascal's wager is also not geared for multiple competing god scenarios where various forms or selections of gods are given they may be mutually or partially exclusive.
