Changes

By itself, this demolishes one part of the evolutionists’ argument and makes it, clearly, a case of arbitrary imposition of modern values. In a context such as the above, ‘radically different design’ would have indicated to an ancient reader either no deity, or else a deity whose means was chaos and instability, or a deity who did not have mastery over creation.<ref>Holding, 2006</ref>}}

By itself, this demolishes one part of the evolutionists’ argument and makes it, clearly, a case of arbitrary imposition of modern values. In a context such as the above, ‘radically different design’ would have indicated to an ancient reader either no deity, or else a deity whose means was chaos and instability, or a deity who did not have mastery over creation.<ref>Holding, 2006</ref>}}

==External Links==

==External Links==

*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6P6bXA50c0&feature=related Neo-Darwinism's Homology Problem]

*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6P6bXA50c0&feature=related Neo-Darwinism's Homology Problem - Video Clip]

== Bibliography ==

== Bibliography ==