| Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| | | | |
| | ===According to Atheistic Evolutionists=== | | ===According to Atheistic Evolutionists=== |
| − | Some proponents of the scientific theory of evolution reject the idea of a philosophy or world view that guides their conclusions in scientific experimentation. | + | Some proponents of the scientific theory of evolution reject the idea of a philosophy or world view that guides their conclusions in scientific experimentation. However, the evolutionists who are 'strong atheists' (they make a positive assertion that there is no God) do, in fact have a world view, whereas the 'weak atheists' (they say there is probably no God due to lack of any objective evidence of Him) rely on science. |
| | + | |
| | + | '''Strong Atheism''' |
| | * There is no God (world view) | | * There is no God (world view) |
| | ** Therefore we need to explain everything based on that "fact" | | ** Therefore we need to explain everything based on that "fact" |
| | *** Thus science is done on the basis of there being no God (i.e. [[naturalism (science)|naturalism]]) | | *** Thus science is done on the basis of there being no God (i.e. [[naturalism (science)|naturalism]]) |
| | **** Naturalism comes ''before'' the science. The science is based on the world view. | | **** Naturalism comes ''before'' the science. The science is based on the world view. |
| | + | |
| | + | '''Weak Atheism''' |
| | + | * So far, there is no objective proof of God |
| | + | ** Therefore, we do not need to interpret evidence to fit in with the "fact" of God's existence |
| | + | *** Thus science is done on the basis of there being no God (unless His existence becomes objectively proven) |
| | + | **** The world view relies on the evidence, so the science comes ''before'' the world view. |
| | | | |
| | ===Comparison=== | | ===Comparison=== |