Difference between revisions of "Talk:Journalistic malpractice"
From Conservapedia
(→Term use) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Term use== | ==Term use== | ||
Wouldn't journalistic malpractice describe when any journalist does something unethical in their practice? Also, wouldn't malpractice require negligence? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 18:46, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | Wouldn't journalistic malpractice describe when any journalist does something unethical in their practice? Also, wouldn't malpractice require negligence? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 18:46, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Agreed on both points. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:53, 22 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:53, October 22, 2008
I'm assuming that this is a work in progress and that the uncited opinions are just in passing? HelpJazz 14:36, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
- PS: I had to type a CAPTCHA to create this page even though there was no link, and it took me four times!!! HelpJazz 14:38, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
- you are correct, Rush Limbaugh just used the term, Medved did in '07 and WaPo in '05. --Jpatt 14:42, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
Term use
Wouldn't journalistic malpractice describe when any journalist does something unethical in their practice? Also, wouldn't malpractice require negligence? LiamG 18:46, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
