Difference between revisions of "Talk:Recession of 2008"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Recession of the Late 2000's to Talk:Recession of 2008 over redirect: usual title--otherwise title will be weird in a couple years) |
("late 2000s" does not work) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT) | :Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::Recessions and depressions are always named the year they began. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] | + | ::Recessions and depressions are always named the year they began. The title "recession of the late 2000s" won't make sense next week when we are in 2010. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:00, 27 December 2009 (EST) |
| + | |||
| + | |||
== First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated. == | == First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated. == | ||
As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section. I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that. --[[User:Dfrischknecht|Dfrischknecht]] 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT) | As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section. I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that. --[[User:Dfrischknecht|Dfrischknecht]] 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:thanks for spotting that. It's caused by a new computer virus called "cut-and-past-itis". [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 02:58, 22 October 2009 (EDT) | :thanks for spotting that. It's caused by a new computer virus called "cut-and-past-itis". [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 02:58, 22 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:00, December 27, 2009
Rename article?
Can we rename this article to the recession of 2008-2009? This has become Obama's Recession. Brown25 00:56, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
- Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
- Recessions and depressions are always named the year they began. The title "recession of the late 2000s" won't make sense next week when we are in 2010. RJJensen 18:00, 27 December 2009 (EST)
First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated.
As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section. I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that. --Dfrischknecht 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT)
- thanks for spotting that. It's caused by a new computer virus called "cut-and-past-itis". RJJensen 02:58, 22 October 2009 (EDT)