Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + + + + + + +
excellent, modified notation proposed
::::[[User:AmandaBunting|AmandaBunting]] 12:12, 28 May 2010 (EDT)
::::[[User:AmandaBunting|AmandaBunting]] 12:12, 28 May 2010 (EDT)
:::::Your suggestion is excellent but I would propose the following slightly modified notation:
::::::
:::::::<math>E_x(t)={\operatorname{c}\over\operatorname{c}+o} \!</math>100%
::::::Also, some attempts are futile because the resilience is so high, and that needs to be considered.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:20, 28 May 2010 (EDT)