Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 23:00, April 1, 2007

537 bytes added , 23:00, April 1, 2007

Line 497: Line 497:

::Well, in the case above, they use both "militant" and "terrorist" to describe Al Qaeda, so, that's at least a baby step when it comes to calling terrorists terrorists. I guess we'll have to keep watching it to see what gets removed and what stays.--[[User:Epicurius|Epicurius]] 16:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

+

::: The "militant" reference complies with Wikipedia policy; the "terrorist" reference does not. If and when someone complains to Wikipedia admins, I would expect the "terrorist" adjective to be replaced with "militant".--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:00, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

::And Conservapedia using Wikipedia permalinks isn't at all hypocritical, is it? [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 14:15, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

+

::: Don't follow you here. Please be specific. We generally not accept Wikipedia as an authoratitive resource, if that's what you mean. Attempts to do so here, if any, should probably be corrected.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:00, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,468

edits