Difference between revisions of "Mystery:Nevada Election 2010"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(a start, please improve)
 
(is this what you meant?)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Harry Reid]] was being by three points in several independent polls on the eve of [[Election Day]], 2010, but the next day was declared the winner by more than five points.  ''This was an unexplained discrepancy of more than eight points''.
+
[[Harry Reid]] was trailing by three points in several independent polls on the eve of [[Election Day]], 2010, but the next day was declared the winner by more than five points.  ''This was an unexplained discrepancy of more than eight points''.
  
 
What is the explanation?  The [[mainstream media]] have been silent in even asking this question of their own side.  [[Fox News Channel]] was prepared to run a show on election fraud in [[Nevada]] but canceled it when [[Sharron Angle]] prematurely conceded.
 
What is the explanation?  The [[mainstream media]] have been silent in even asking this question of their own side.  [[Fox News Channel]] was prepared to run a show on election fraud in [[Nevada]] but canceled it when [[Sharron Angle]] prematurely conceded.

Revision as of 00:36, November 6, 2010

Harry Reid was trailing by three points in several independent polls on the eve of Election Day, 2010, but the next day was declared the winner by more than five points. This was an unexplained discrepancy of more than eight points.

What is the explanation? The mainstream media have been silent in even asking this question of their own side. Fox News Channel was prepared to run a show on election fraud in Nevada but canceled it when Sharron Angle prematurely conceded.

(post voting data here)