Difference between revisions of "Tank"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Image:tank1.jpg|thumb|250px| | + | [[Image:tank1.jpg|thumb|250px|A British Challenger II main battle tank, one of the most advanced modern tanks]] |
| − | A '''tank''' is | + | A '''tank''' is an armored, tracked military vehicle designed to engage enemy troops, vehicles and fortifications with direct fire. They were first developed during [[World War I]] by the [[British]]. They were a direct result of the advances in motorized transport. The tank's original purpose was to break the trench warfare stalemate that had bogged down the Western Front of the war. Armored cars had already seen limited use, but their poor combat performance persuaded Major Ernest Swinton to develop a tracked fighting vehicle. Due to the regards for secrecy, the teams working on the project were initially told they were designing and building a vehicle to carry water through desert terrain, hence it being referred to as, "that tank thing." The first tank produced by this committee was nicknamed Little Willie. It was tested by the British military in 1915 and was called a landship. The Little Willy design was followed up by the Mark I, which was actually produced in two variants. The "Male" version carried two 6-pounder light artillery guns in its side sponsons while the "Female" version swapped those for four light machine-guns. The [[France|French]] also developed a tank that was based off a Holt caterpillar and first fielded it in 1917. When the United States entered the war in late 1917, the US Army was initially unsure of how to use the new weapons, but eventually settled on using them as a replacement for horse-mounted cavalry. Based on that decision, the US Army opted to use the French tank design through the end of the war. Tanks immediately made trench warfare obsolete and would later come to dominate land warfare through most of the 20th century. |
| + | |||
| + | The years following WWI saw tank development stagnate, with most interest having faded with the memories of the war. However, this was short lived as the 1930s saw a resurgence in weapons R&D Every major country knew that the tank designs of WWI were woefully obsolete and began developing new tanks to meet the challenges of new warfare. Nazi Germany took the lead in the 1930s and developed a series of progressively better tanks. The earliest of these designs were proven woefully inadequate for the battlefield in terms of firepower, protection and mobility. Funtionally, the early models of the Panzer I were no better than the French tanks of WWI. The Wehrmacht High Command learned hard lessons that quickly led to substantial design improvements. The German military leadership developed a new kind of warfare that was perfectly suited to the strengths of the tank. German [[Blitzkrieg]] tactics were the first employment of Combined Arms strategy, exploiting the strengths of artillery, infantry, close air support and tanks carefully coordinated together proved devastatingly effective against every standing army and enabled the rapid conquest of [[France]] and the [[Low Countries]] in May-June 1940 and in 1941 helped Nazi Germany push all the way to the edge of [[Moscow]]. Ironically, the Wehrmacht employed a military philosophy originally devised by a [[British]] tactician, Major [[Basil Liddell-Hart]], but ignored by the [[British]] War Office. Tank warfare continued to be a crucial part of the conflict in [[North Africa]], and on the eastern front the [[Battle of Kursk]] in 1943. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Military doctrine on tank design and employment remained stagnant following the end of WWII, though designs continued to improve through the early years of the Cold War. The reigning philosophy on tank warfare relied on two distinct types to fill separate roles on the battlefield. The first type was a slower, heavy tank equipped with a general purpose main gun and machine-guns for supporting infantry. These were called "Infantry Tanks" by the British and simply "Tanks" by the US. Prime examples would be the British "Matilda" or US M-4 "Sherman." The second type was fast, light armored tank that carried a powerful, armor-piercing main gun. These were referred to as "Cruiser Tanks" and "Tank Destroyers" by the British and US militaries respectively. The concept of two separate tank types eventually proved impractical for battlefield employment and became obsolete by the end of the 1950's as countries shifted towards the Main Battle Tank concept. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The first Main Battle Tanks (MBTs)were developed at the end of the 1950's and entered service around the world in the early 1960's. The basic idea being that a tank with adequate protection, firepower and mobility can fulfill the roles of both infantry support and tank combat at once. The first generation of MBTs were primarily upgrades of the existing infantry support tanks with bigger guns and modernized targeting systems. The US Army's M60 Patton was the first American MBT and served in the Army from 1960 to 1997. Many upgraded M60 tanks are still in service around the world under a diverse range of flags including Egypt, Turkey, Israel and Taiwan to name a few. Contemporary designs to the M60 included the British Chieftan and Soviet T-64 MBTs. | ||
| − | |||
[[Image:tank2.gif|thumb|250px|A British [[Mark I tank]], the first tank to be used in warfare]] | [[Image:tank2.gif|thumb|250px|A British [[Mark I tank]], the first tank to be used in warfare]] | ||
| − | Modern tanks combine | + | Modern tanks combine mobility, armor and firepower to ensure maximum survavability and lethality on the battlefield. The combination has resulted in one of the most effective land weapon systems. Tanks remain vulnerable to airstrikes and helicopters, as well as other tanks, anti-tank missiles, heavy artillery and anti-tank mines or Improvised Explosive Devices. A modern tank typically has a crew of four, a commander, a gunner, a loader and a driver. Tanks require considerable logistical support to operate effectively. Modern tanks mount a single, smooth-bore, large caliber gun with both armor piercing (for use against other tanks) and high explosive (for use against light vehicles, infantry and buildings) ammunition as well as one or more [[machine guns]]. Tank armor is strongest and thickest on the front of the tank, with lesser protection on the sides, rear, top and underside. Armor has evolved from homogenous steel to advanced composite materials including "Chobham" armor and "reactive" armor (designed to explode and disrupt/destroy incoming projectiles). Research is underway into "active" defense systems that would destroy incoming projectiles before they could reach the tank itself. Israel's army is currently employing said systems on its Merkava tanks. |
The rise of effective infantry anti-tank weapons has since eroded the dominance the tank enjoyed during the middle of the 20th century. Unsupported Israeli armored units suffered heavy losses at the hands of Egyptian troops with modern [[ATGM]]s in the Sinai. It is now considered essential for tanks to be supported by infantry at all times. | The rise of effective infantry anti-tank weapons has since eroded the dominance the tank enjoyed during the middle of the 20th century. Unsupported Israeli armored units suffered heavy losses at the hands of Egyptian troops with modern [[ATGM]]s in the Sinai. It is now considered essential for tanks to be supported by infantry at all times. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 16: | ||
Modern armies use the designation "Main Battle Tank" (MBT) for their primary tanks. Currently the following MBTs are in front line service with the following countries. | Modern armies use the designation "Main Battle Tank" (MBT) for their primary tanks. Currently the following MBTs are in front line service with the following countries. | ||
| − | *[[USA]] - | + | *[[USA]] - M1 Abrams series, which includes M1, M1A1 and M1A2 upgrades |
*[[UK]] - Challenger 2 | *[[UK]] - Challenger 2 | ||
*[[Germany]] - Leopard 2 | *[[Germany]] - Leopard 2 | ||
*[[Russia]] - T80 / T90 | *[[Russia]] - T80 / T90 | ||
| + | *[[China]] - Type 96 | ||
*[[Israel]] - Merkava | *[[Israel]] - Merkava | ||
*[[France]] - Leclerc | *[[France]] - Leclerc | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Armored Fighting Vehicles]] | [[Category:Armored Fighting Vehicles]] | ||
Revision as of 18:43, February 21, 2011
A tank is an armored, tracked military vehicle designed to engage enemy troops, vehicles and fortifications with direct fire. They were first developed during World War I by the British. They were a direct result of the advances in motorized transport. The tank's original purpose was to break the trench warfare stalemate that had bogged down the Western Front of the war. Armored cars had already seen limited use, but their poor combat performance persuaded Major Ernest Swinton to develop a tracked fighting vehicle. Due to the regards for secrecy, the teams working on the project were initially told they were designing and building a vehicle to carry water through desert terrain, hence it being referred to as, "that tank thing." The first tank produced by this committee was nicknamed Little Willie. It was tested by the British military in 1915 and was called a landship. The Little Willy design was followed up by the Mark I, which was actually produced in two variants. The "Male" version carried two 6-pounder light artillery guns in its side sponsons while the "Female" version swapped those for four light machine-guns. The French also developed a tank that was based off a Holt caterpillar and first fielded it in 1917. When the United States entered the war in late 1917, the US Army was initially unsure of how to use the new weapons, but eventually settled on using them as a replacement for horse-mounted cavalry. Based on that decision, the US Army opted to use the French tank design through the end of the war. Tanks immediately made trench warfare obsolete and would later come to dominate land warfare through most of the 20th century.
The years following WWI saw tank development stagnate, with most interest having faded with the memories of the war. However, this was short lived as the 1930s saw a resurgence in weapons R&D Every major country knew that the tank designs of WWI were woefully obsolete and began developing new tanks to meet the challenges of new warfare. Nazi Germany took the lead in the 1930s and developed a series of progressively better tanks. The earliest of these designs were proven woefully inadequate for the battlefield in terms of firepower, protection and mobility. Funtionally, the early models of the Panzer I were no better than the French tanks of WWI. The Wehrmacht High Command learned hard lessons that quickly led to substantial design improvements. The German military leadership developed a new kind of warfare that was perfectly suited to the strengths of the tank. German Blitzkrieg tactics were the first employment of Combined Arms strategy, exploiting the strengths of artillery, infantry, close air support and tanks carefully coordinated together proved devastatingly effective against every standing army and enabled the rapid conquest of France and the Low Countries in May-June 1940 and in 1941 helped Nazi Germany push all the way to the edge of Moscow. Ironically, the Wehrmacht employed a military philosophy originally devised by a British tactician, Major Basil Liddell-Hart, but ignored by the British War Office. Tank warfare continued to be a crucial part of the conflict in North Africa, and on the eastern front the Battle of Kursk in 1943.
Military doctrine on tank design and employment remained stagnant following the end of WWII, though designs continued to improve through the early years of the Cold War. The reigning philosophy on tank warfare relied on two distinct types to fill separate roles on the battlefield. The first type was a slower, heavy tank equipped with a general purpose main gun and machine-guns for supporting infantry. These were called "Infantry Tanks" by the British and simply "Tanks" by the US. Prime examples would be the British "Matilda" or US M-4 "Sherman." The second type was fast, light armored tank that carried a powerful, armor-piercing main gun. These were referred to as "Cruiser Tanks" and "Tank Destroyers" by the British and US militaries respectively. The concept of two separate tank types eventually proved impractical for battlefield employment and became obsolete by the end of the 1950's as countries shifted towards the Main Battle Tank concept.
The first Main Battle Tanks (MBTs)were developed at the end of the 1950's and entered service around the world in the early 1960's. The basic idea being that a tank with adequate protection, firepower and mobility can fulfill the roles of both infantry support and tank combat at once. The first generation of MBTs were primarily upgrades of the existing infantry support tanks with bigger guns and modernized targeting systems. The US Army's M60 Patton was the first American MBT and served in the Army from 1960 to 1997. Many upgraded M60 tanks are still in service around the world under a diverse range of flags including Egypt, Turkey, Israel and Taiwan to name a few. Contemporary designs to the M60 included the British Chieftan and Soviet T-64 MBTs.
Modern tanks combine mobility, armor and firepower to ensure maximum survavability and lethality on the battlefield. The combination has resulted in one of the most effective land weapon systems. Tanks remain vulnerable to airstrikes and helicopters, as well as other tanks, anti-tank missiles, heavy artillery and anti-tank mines or Improvised Explosive Devices. A modern tank typically has a crew of four, a commander, a gunner, a loader and a driver. Tanks require considerable logistical support to operate effectively. Modern tanks mount a single, smooth-bore, large caliber gun with both armor piercing (for use against other tanks) and high explosive (for use against light vehicles, infantry and buildings) ammunition as well as one or more machine guns. Tank armor is strongest and thickest on the front of the tank, with lesser protection on the sides, rear, top and underside. Armor has evolved from homogenous steel to advanced composite materials including "Chobham" armor and "reactive" armor (designed to explode and disrupt/destroy incoming projectiles). Research is underway into "active" defense systems that would destroy incoming projectiles before they could reach the tank itself. Israel's army is currently employing said systems on its Merkava tanks.
The rise of effective infantry anti-tank weapons has since eroded the dominance the tank enjoyed during the middle of the 20th century. Unsupported Israeli armored units suffered heavy losses at the hands of Egyptian troops with modern ATGMs in the Sinai. It is now considered essential for tanks to be supported by infantry at all times.
Modern armies use the designation "Main Battle Tank" (MBT) for their primary tanks. Currently the following MBTs are in front line service with the following countries.
