SkipCaptcha
966
edits
Changes
Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (view source)
Revision as of 02:28, September 8, 2011
, 02:28, September 8, 2011→Parody: It begins with trivial, laughable things and ends up with Christians in death camps. Putting it another way, if you spot a weed in your garden you pull it out rather than let it fester a
::Also, a lot of users are adding words like "cow" and "door knob" which don't have any political controversy attached to them. As this project is designed to combat liberal redefinition, rather than just list every word (I assume), perhaps we should make it a requirement that any new entry is made with the 'Liberal false definition' clearly stated. Otherwise troublemakers will sneak any old word in. Thoughts? [[User:Patrick78|Patrick78]] 10:27, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::Also, a lot of users are adding words like "cow" and "door knob" which don't have any political controversy attached to them. As this project is designed to combat liberal redefinition, rather than just list every word (I assume), perhaps we should make it a requirement that any new entry is made with the 'Liberal false definition' clearly stated. Otherwise troublemakers will sneak any old word in. Thoughts? [[User:Patrick78|Patrick78]] 10:27, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::: As BradleyS states above, Consevapedia itself has an article on [[doorknob]] and other non-political subjects. Has anyone suggested removing these articles? If Conservapedia, a conservative encyclopedia, has entries on these why shouldn't a conservative dictionary have them? Also, I don't see why a word has to have a [[liberal redefinition]] to be here. Fighting liberal redefinition is just one aspect of this project. But even in this respect, it's useful. Liberals might try to redefine any word in the future, so we should define them here before then. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 22:26, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::: As BradleyS states above, Consevapedia itself has an article on [[doorknob]] and other non-political subjects. Has anyone suggested removing these articles? If Conservapedia, a conservative encyclopedia, has entries on these why shouldn't a conservative dictionary have them? Also, I don't see why a word has to have a [[liberal redefinition]] to be here. Fighting liberal redefinition is just one aspect of this project. But even in this respect, it's useful. Liberals might try to redefine any word in the future, so we should define them here before then. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 22:26, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::::Because the implication of it being on here with the statement "True conservative definition" implies somebody is trying to create a false definition. When the liberals try and redefine '''Zebra''', you let us know.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:28, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
== A suggestion for proceeding ==
== A suggestion for proceeding ==