100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
Talk:Presidential debates 2012 (view source)
Revision as of 19:05, September 13, 2012
, 19:05, September 13, 2012no edit summary
::That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
::That's not what i think at all, don't put words in my mouth. But many conservatives, including this website, see Romney as a RINO. Conservatives who are not thrilled about Romney may well not see his election as "good" in its own right. Analyzing in terms of advantages and disadvantages is far more professional, and doesn't assume that a RINO is "good." [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:47, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
Also, a moderator's dietary choices are irrelevant, and calling someone an "affirmative action recipient" without evidence looks petty. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 14:53, 13 September 2012 (EDT)
:Romney is obviously a RINO, but that doesn't mean that 4 more years of BHO wouldn't be a complete disaster. Why are you reverting my entire edit if your gripes are just nit picking? Fix it if you have problems with it. The biases of the moderators is vitally important and your eagerness to censor the information is telling. [[User:CraigF2|CraigF2]] 15:05, 13 September 2012 (EDT)