Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Conservapedia
Disclaimers
Conservapedia
Search
Changes
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Essay:A Refutation of the 15 Questions
(view source)
Revision as of 16:43, January 4, 2013
6 bytes added
,
16:43, January 4, 2013
→Part 2: 15 Questions for Creationists
Line 67:
Line 67:
==Part 2: 15 Questions for Creationists==
==Part 2: 15 Questions for Creationists==
−
The evidence points to living things evolving, so how do creationists know that they were designed?
+
'''
The evidence points to living things evolving, so how do creationists know that they were designed?
Why is creationist "just-so" story-telling tolerated?
Why is creationist "just-so" story-telling tolerated?
Line 95:
Line 95:
If intelligent design should be taught in schools, why not other religious beliefs? See [[Flying Spaghetti Monster]]
If intelligent design should be taught in schools, why not other religious beliefs? See [[Flying Spaghetti Monster]]
−
In what way is intelligent design a logical process? How were living beings designed?
+
In what way is intelligent design a logical process? How were living beings designed?
'''
RaymondZ
79
edits