Changes

→‎Two millionth page view for the "Counterexamples to Relativity" page: When something decays to a lower energy state it can emit energy. That is not relativity, that is not E=mc<ref>2</ref>, and
Line 171: Line 171:     
:::::Does it really? SamHB described a process where '''mass''' disappears - you answered that ''there is nothing startling about an emission or loss of '''energy'''''.  This gives the impression that you think of mass and energy as somewhat interchangeable. I know that you don't think so, that's why I asked for you to  ''"rephrase your point #3"''. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:26, 21 December 2014 (EST)
 
:::::Does it really? SamHB described a process where '''mass''' disappears - you answered that ''there is nothing startling about an emission or loss of '''energy'''''.  This gives the impression that you think of mass and energy as somewhat interchangeable. I know that you don't think so, that's why I asked for you to  ''"rephrase your point #3"''. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:26, 21 December 2014 (EST)
 +
 +
::::::When something decays to a lower energy state it can emit energy.  That is not relativity, that is not E=mc<ref>2</ref>, and that is not "mass-energy equivalence."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:53, 21 December 2014 (EST)
    
==Categories==
 
==Categories==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits