Changes

53 bytes removed ,  03:53, December 28, 2015
m
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:     
Rooker-Feldman also "does not prohibit federal district courts from exercising jurisdiction where the plaintiff's claim is merely a general challenge to the constitutionality of the state law applied in the state action, rather than a challenge to the law's application in a particular state case."  ''Hood v. Keller'', 341 F.3d 593, 597 (6th Cir. 2003) (internal quotations omitted).
 
Rooker-Feldman also "does not prohibit federal district courts from exercising jurisdiction where the plaintiff's claim is merely a general challenge to the constitutionality of the state law applied in the state action, rather than a challenge to the law's application in a particular state case."  ''Hood v. Keller'', 341 F.3d 593, 597 (6th Cir. 2003) (internal quotations omitted).
−
  −
Raymond v. Moyer, 501 F.3d 548, 551 (6th Cir. 2007)
   
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits