Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Debate: Infant baptism (view source)
Revision as of 02:55, November 6, 2019
, 02:55, November 6, 2019→This should be easy to resolve.: deleted irrelevant statement taken by copy from Talk:Infant baptism that doen't belong here.
I hope this helps. [[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 17:44, 5 November 2019 (EST)
I hope this helps. [[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 17:44, 5 November 2019 (EST)
:Yes and no. The real problem is [[Salvation]]. Look at that article. It's a mess. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 17:48, 5 November 2019 (EST)
:Yes and no. The real problem is [[Salvation]]. Look at that article. It's a mess. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 17:48, 5 November 2019 (EST)
::It can be resolved. The [[Petrine Primacy]] article was resolved. If Wikipedia can have its Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, etc begin to create an informative article, there is no reason why Conservapedia can't do the same.
::It can be resolved. The [[Petrine Primacy]] article was resolved. If Wikipedia can have its Protestants, Catholics, Orthodox, etc begin to create an informative article, there is no reason why Conservapedia can't do the same.