Changes

Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)

Revision as of 15:58, June 2, 2008

284 bytes added , 15:58, June 2, 2008

Line 187: Line 187:

:# And you agree that what you call "fluff" that you removed can go in the article after all, but not near the beginning. That's pretty much what I suggested earlier.

:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:42, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

+

:: Oh, I'm sorry for not being clearer. I'm fine with the less important stuff, like the names of plaintiffs who had no financial interest in the case or the names of law firms that did some work, appearing later in the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:58, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,506

edits