Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
Talk:National Organization for Marriage (view source)
Revision as of 22:52, May 5, 2010
, 22:52, May 5, 2010→Why were my changes reverted?: reply to CChance
::I would think that it was because of your clever wiki-lawyering, parsing the article to remove the main purpose of the organization, which is to defend heterosexual marriage, not all kinds of "marriage" as defined by liberals. If you wish to be clever and be a pretend lawyer, try Wikipedia. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:43, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
::I would think that it was because of your clever wiki-lawyering, parsing the article to remove the main purpose of the organization, which is to defend heterosexual marriage, not all kinds of "marriage" as defined by liberals. If you wish to be clever and be a pretend lawyer, try Wikipedia. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:43, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
:::See? TK agrees with me. The organization's purpose is to protect ''heterosexual'' marriage. [[User:CChance|CChance]] 18:47, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
:::See? TK agrees with me. The organization's purpose is to protect ''heterosexual'' marriage. [[User:CChance|CChance]] 18:47, 5 May 2010 (EDT)
::::CChance, I've found your edits to be silly at best. Can you make more substantive contributions? If not, you might try a different site for make-believe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:52, 5 May 2010 (EDT)