80
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 64:
Line 64: +
Talk:Debate:Should RobS lose his Sysop rights? (view source)
Revision as of 02:28, August 2, 2011
, 02:28, August 2, 2011→the voters
:It would seem that some editors with blocking rights and a certain sysop are taking control of this by banning or blocking every remotely questionable user anyway. I would guess that at least half of the users in the nay will be blocked by the end of this.--[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 22:18, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
:It would seem that some editors with blocking rights and a certain sysop are taking control of this by banning or blocking every remotely questionable user anyway. I would guess that at least half of the users in the nay will be blocked by the end of this.--[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 22:18, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::I think this is a serious issue. People on both sides of the vote have no real contributions and should not be given a say in Conservapedia's affairs.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:24, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::I think this is a serious issue. People on both sides of the vote have no real contributions and should not be given a say in Conservapedia's affairs.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:24, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
::: I agree and it seems that many of them have already been banned for being socks or vandals. Hopefully this doesn't scare off actual users with valid opinions.--[[User:MRellek|MRellek]] 22:28, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
== This page is not being honest ==
== This page is not being honest ==