Conservapedia:Abuse

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jtl (talk | contribs) at 04:34, April 17, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is where you can report abuse of editing privileges. Please make notes short and concise. Unsigned posts will be removed.

Sysops, please move notes down to 'old alerts' once the incident is closed.

Archives: 1 2 3

Other links:


Current Alerts

  1. RightWolf2 (talk • contribs • count) - threats, no useful edits --Ed Poor 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
    I vote for a block. I think he returned simply to threaten me, again. I've requested an explanation from him on his talk page. Who let him back? It's OK this time, but pretty soon we'll need some accountability for those who unblock someone who becomes a problem again.--Aschlafly 18:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Didn't he admit to making overly polemic right-wing entries that he didn't really believe in himself awhile back to "test" the site? I remember getting into an argument with him about a month ago about his attempt to qualify Fred Phelps as a "leader in the pro-family movement". DanH 18:48, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
You remember right, Dan. He's problematic. --~ TK MyTalk 19:26, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
    • 18:51, 21 March 2007 TimSvendsen (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked RightWolf2 (contribs)
    • 18:27, 21 March 2007 TK (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "RightWolf2 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 days (Disruption, Threats. I did this to take the responsibility off Hoji.)
  2. Sterile (talk • contribs • count) - 90/10 rule --Ed Poor 18:43, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
  3. Terreista and LambChop -blocked, socks of each other --~ TK MyTalk 16:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
  4. ILikeCookies (talk • contribs • count) - not so much abusive edits as just plain fluff--doesn't quite seem appropriate. What does everybody think?
  5. Save Our Values (talk • contribs • count)
  6. The 6 random hex digit sock perp is back: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Log/newusers Myk 13:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
  7. Homeschool mom (talk • contribs • count) lays it on too thick - suspected parodist
Warned 4/15. Awaiting response.--Aschlafly 13:27, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
No response. Another user said that her edits are copies from Wikipedia. Looks like we may have to block. Give her another day to respond?--Aschlafly 20:46, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. GofG (talk • contribs • count) useless edits - warned
  2. Vyngarsson (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling, see [2] for a good example. Another example [3]
  3. Phiattiangel (talk • contribs • count) - 11 April 2007, trolling.

Dealt with

  1. AppliedFaith (talk • contribs • count) -trolling, see [4][5], "sexual activity is always impure, even when conducted within marriage."
  2. User:AnonymousLegion - Vandalism--Epicurius 14:59, 4 April 2007 (EDT) --Blocked by --Elamdri 18:44, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
  3. User:Mjc12 - blocked by Conservative
  4. Polarbear (talk • contribs • count) - Please check authenticity of comments and contribs---Blocked by Elamdri 00:01, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
  5. TK blocked Cheney123 (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandalism: "Democrats" )
  6. User:Theelephant - Vandalism--Epicurius 18:09, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
    • 18:09, 4 April 2007 Tsumetai blocked Theelephant (contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (obscenity)
  7. Cooperstown4 (talk • contribs • count) - 9 April 2007, TK blocked Cooperstown4 (infinite, account creation blocked) (Vandal/Nonsense/Insults)
  8. Zac4213 (talk • contribs • count) - Was my block too hasty?
  9. Jaques (talk • contribs • count)- Many recent edits very similar to Wikipedia and use exact same pictures, See Whale and Plankton.
Jaques is a frequent contributor and many of his entries are good. The complaint would have to be more specific than this. There is nothing wrong about copying public domain pictures, for example.--Aschlafly 13:23, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. Mandolin2k (talk • contribs • count) - Joke entry (see "Jellystone")
  2. Godblessamerica (talk • contribs • count) - Copying from Wikipedia, prank edit here: [6]
  3. Hamtandrus (talk • contribs • count) -self identified Holocaust denier. [7]
I think he's just being facetious.--Elamdri 00:37, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
He also says that he's 'done with this - place' Wikinterpreter
No block Holocaust denial isn't against the rules. Geo.Talk 18:39, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
  1. SRogers (talk • contribs • count) - anti-Semitism; see piped link Judaism|bankers in Federal Reserve article, for example [8] -- 6 month block, (Conduct detrimental to Conservapedia --RobS 15:31, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
  2. Aschlafly (talk • contribs • count) Complaint removed by TK (talk • contribs • count). No action taken --Jtl 00:34, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Abuse&oldid=112195"