User talk:Dataclarifier
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dataclarifier (Talk | contribs) at 00:48, August 25, 2020. It may differ significantly from current revision.
This page intentionally left blank.
Debate: Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical
You are not debating. You are just spamming. Please stop. Please remove your spam. If you wish to cite scripture and provide external links, it must be relevant to the Debate topic, Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical? in a narrative context. This is not an unreasonable request and is a simple courtesy to other debaters and readers of the page. Spamming is disruptive of the Debate format. If you have any questions, please contact me here, on my User page, or on the Debate talk page. Thank you. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:19, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- I provided the links demanded at the top of the Debate page to already existing citations of scripture. They are directly relevant to the claim that Catholic doctrine is biblical. --Dataclarifier (talk) 20:25, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- Meaningless. If you wish to cite a scripture, and provide an external link to a scripture, it must in the context of debate. Carpet bombing the page with external links not relevant to a specific point under debate in unacceptable conduct. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:30, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- Your position in the debate is that the Catholic doctrine is not biblical. They are directly relevant. Visible evidence that Catholic doctrine is overwhelmingly biblical, a claim you stoutly reject in the face of such overwhelming evidence. --Dataclarifier (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- Than address that specific Antagonist point in debate. Carpet bombing the page with spam is not an acceptable or meaningful response. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:36, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- In the forum of the debate this is introductory as presenting the affirmative position. "Here you are ladies and gentlemen. This is the evidence from the Bible for the position that Catholic doctrine is biblical. The debate will offer opinions for and against this scriptural material."--Dataclarifier (talk) 20:39, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- You've provided nothing from the Catechism, which overrides scripture.
- It's spam. You have a simple choice, remove the spam and debate in a civil manner, or let me remove the spam and enjoy a short term block. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:42, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- I provided direct links to the Catechism with the headings of the table of contents and quote boxes on the page. Links are provided for those who wish to check the material. No one is required to read it. "Eyeballing" the sheer weight of the evidence is effective enough for those who never knew so much o the Bible is used claimed as support for Catholic doctrine.
It looks to me like you consider your position too weak to stand against such a weight of material so visible that you feel you have to get rid of the evidence. --Dataclarifier (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- I provided direct links to the Catechism with the headings of the table of contents and quote boxes on the page. Links are provided for those who wish to check the material. No one is required to read it. "Eyeballing" the sheer weight of the evidence is effective enough for those who never knew so much o the Bible is used claimed as support for Catholic doctrine.
- In the forum of the debate this is introductory as presenting the affirmative position. "Here you are ladies and gentlemen. This is the evidence from the Bible for the position that Catholic doctrine is biblical. The debate will offer opinions for and against this scriptural material."--Dataclarifier (talk) 20:39, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
- Than address that specific Antagonist point in debate. Carpet bombing the page with spam is not an acceptable or meaningful response. RobSTrump 2Q2Q 20:36, 24 August 2020 (EDT)
