User talk:Cruizir
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LT (talk | contribs) at 15:09, December 10, 2020. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Don't remove content from pages
Don't remove content from pages, as you did here. Some of the details were also mentioned on other pages with sources, so be constructive unless you prefer to get blocked. âLTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Thursday, 09:45, 10 December 2020 (EST)
- They were totally non sensical to the point where I don't think anything good could come out of them. Cruizir (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2020 (EST)
- Totally nonsensical? Those details are true and are relevant to the article, as it was far-left rioters vandalizing statues and terrorizing cities. Also, don't insert a deceitful liberal POV in articles like you did here. â
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Thursday, 09:54, 10 December 2020 (EST)- First off I am not a liberal I am a leftist. Conservatives are closer to liberals than leftists by a good margin. Most of the statue vandalism was not by "far leftists" by any means and even if it was who cares theyre god damn statues of old racist people. If they weren't old racist people the vandals were probably just random rioters who want to live out fantasies of society collapsing who are a lot more likely to be conservatives than anywhere on the left. None of those murders are by people proven to be leftists. "Liberal Pov" Your whole wiki is POV propaganda Cruizir (talk) 10:02, 10 December 2020 (EST)
- No, the vandals were far-leftists because they were mostly part of BLM/Antifa. The anti-police violence rampant this year also has a lot to do with the left-wing anarchist hate groups. Also, your attempt to justify vandalism of statues is quite lame: they are there because history is meant to be learned from and not forgotten. The fact that the left is fighting so hard to remove them says quite a lot. â
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Thursday, 10:09, 10 December 2020 (EST)
- No, the vandals were far-leftists because they were mostly part of BLM/Antifa. The anti-police violence rampant this year also has a lot to do with the left-wing anarchist hate groups. Also, your attempt to justify vandalism of statues is quite lame: they are there because history is meant to be learned from and not forgotten. The fact that the left is fighting so hard to remove them says quite a lot. â
- First off I am not a liberal I am a leftist. Conservatives are closer to liberals than leftists by a good margin. Most of the statue vandalism was not by "far leftists" by any means and even if it was who cares theyre god damn statues of old racist people. If they weren't old racist people the vandals were probably just random rioters who want to live out fantasies of society collapsing who are a lot more likely to be conservatives than anywhere on the left. None of those murders are by people proven to be leftists. "Liberal Pov" Your whole wiki is POV propaganda Cruizir (talk) 10:02, 10 December 2020 (EST)
- Totally nonsensical? Those details are true and are relevant to the article, as it was far-left rioters vandalizing statues and terrorizing cities. Also, don't insert a deceitful liberal POV in articles like you did here. â