Talk:History of Ukraine

Content organization

The article is quite immense in word quantity, and most viewers may not find readability to be convenient; perhaps it should be split into further sub-articles of some sort? This article thus could serve as a portal page, with each section giving a brief overview (a straight-up summary might be boring) and links to specific pages with more substantial info. Including additional subsections to divide up the information further would also help. —LT ^{(The Old Right was right!)} Friday, 21:35, December 1, 2022 (EST)

That's a good point. Ukrainian "history" is deeply problematic. Some people today claim Ukraine doesn't exist, while the Zelensky regime even now insists ancient Egyptians were Ukrainians. So where to begin presents problems of its own. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 21:55, December 1, 2022 (EST)

Egyptians are Ukrainians? Wow, next you know, we have always been at war with Eurasia Eastasia Russia!

Also, on another note, I hope the massive blocks of content in the article aren't copy/pasted across multiple pages? It's generally better to have more of a "hierarchy" for article series with a sense of structure and organization between different pages rather than having multiple massive articles containing the exact same paragraphs of information. —LT ^{(The Old Right was right!)} Friday, 22:05, December 1, 2022 (EST)

(ec) I think everything up to here: Origins of Ukraine: 19th century and World War I can go into its separate Kievan Rus' article, being that there was no Ukrainian alphabet of literature prior to this.

Then maybe there some merging from the Russian history article into Kievan Rus. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:06, December 1, 2022 (EST)