User talk:LT

Useful links

• How to edit a wiki
• CP Commandments
• CP Guidelines
• Style Manual
• Editing Etiquette
• How to create and maintain high-quality articles
• Report Problems
• List of Templates

Welcome!

Hello, LT, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, LT!

Thank you

Thank you for unblocking me. I assume I had to be blocked temporarily because this website attracts a lot of trolls and vandals. Maybe it wasn't a good idea for me to immediately suggest things upon registering. Sorry about that. Also, I love your username. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 17:44, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

No problem! Minuteman (run by CP user DavidB4) is supposed to catch vandals/trolls, but sometimes makes mistakes. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Monday, 17:46, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

Sorry about all of the trouble Minuteman has been giving you! I've changes some settings so it shouldn't bother you anymore. I'll have to investigate what went wrong...--DavidB4 ^(TALK) 22:32, December 25, 2022 (EST)

Alright, thanks, DavidB4. —LT ^{(Exodus 23:2)} Monday, 22:48, December 25, 2022 (EST)

Posting some thoughts here

Slightly unrelated but do you think that Conservapedia is becoming more relevant than ever, especially because the left is becoming so bad that people are starting to take communism seriously. People are looking for websites like this more than ever, and I think it has potential for a broad demographic. I'm a young male in my 20s, and I've grown up on good ol' Mario (which feels somewhat conservative at this point because it's one of the few media franchises that BLM and virtue signaling has not yet affected). In earlier decades, many thought the left was normal, but turns out they had this long march through the institutions, which they would subvert into total degeneracy. They are just the biggest ton of liars & make up lies about everyone conservative, especially populists. I used to be left-wing until 2020, when the mask and vaccine push started. It was very depressing for me -- to see my freedoms being taken away in the name of "safety". It reminded me of when I was a kid, as it feels as if I were one of the last to see a world before critical race theory and other divisive narratives. I pray that those days may return soon. Millions have already woken up to the truth. As Donald Trump said, we will win! Patriotic Gamer (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

I dunno if CP is becoming more relevant. Based off my understanding of our Alexa statistics over the past while, we may have lost a significant audience of readers. Our current page view growth for new page creations is rather abysmal compared to before, and vastly improving web traffic will take some good effort. Regarding Mario, you do seem to be right that it hasn't been hijacked by the woke progressives yet. And about COVID-19 restrictions, I can relate because I happen to currently live in a state run by a hypocritical tyrant. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Monday, 18:05, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

Big tech has been censoring conservative voices more than ever, so chances are that it's been burying Conservapedia from search results. The left's game is projection -- I remember growing up, others would tell me that conservatives are trying to ban things like video games, movies, music, etc. They would try and get me to think that conservatives aren't nice people (despite majority being Christians, which I am & have grown up to be). Turns out that the left are the ones who are rewriting history and slowly changing the bookshelves to be more "inclusive." They always exaggerate and twist their words against them. For instance, if we try and protect children from degeneracy, they'll leap out and yell that we're censoring. Everything the left has done is pure projection, and I'm infuriated about these lies that I've grown up in. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 18:19, 24 May 2021 (EDT)

I don't think most people take Conservapedia seriously. It is filled with conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. If Conservapedia advocated purely for conservatism without contradicting science, then more people would take it seriously. I personally do not support American conservatives, but I think that if they made themselves look more credible, then more people, even me, would take their views more seriously. ChenXiansheng (talk) 09:49, July 8, 2021 (EDT)

Can you be more specific? —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 11:08, July 8, 2021 (EDT)

Why are blocks not infinite?

I'm curious to know Patriotic Gamer (talk) 22:43, May 28, 2021 (EDT)

That was the decree set by Andy, so I'm merely following along with the established precedent. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Saturday, 23:10, May 28, 2021 (EDT)

That explains why I've been seeing year-long blocks lately. I personally think that it's very generous because in almost every other wiki, there are those who would not hesitate to permanently ban others for even minor offenses. Patriotic Gamer (talk) 23:14, May 28, 2021 (EDT)

Blocking a user account is not the same as blocking a user. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 23:49, May 28, 2021 (EDT)

Need your help

Sorry to bother you, but can you figure out what I screwed up on this Template? Thanks. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 09:42, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

Ok, I see what the problem was and just fixed it; there was a </noinclude> that didn't have a <noinclude> to enclose. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Friday, 16:17, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

Garcias, Senor. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 16:59, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

No problem! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Friday, 17:00, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

Here's another problem; why is this Template all in small print? [4] RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:04, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

Alright, I just fixed that problem too. [5] I assume the issue has to do with the apparent fact that <sup> must be enclosed with </sup> in the same line or formatting errors will result. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Friday, 17:21, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

Drano Bueno. Gracias. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 17:25, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

You're welcome! —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Friday, 17:28, June 11, 2021 (EDT)

Hi i have edited Template:Infobox person as per wikipedia but you have deleted details 2 times may i know the reason? --HamzhaSaleem (talk) 12:14, July 1, 2021 (EDT)

Hamzha, Can I suggest creating a new Template with a title like Template:Infobox person3 with your improvements? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 13:58, July 1, 2021 (EDT)

HamzhaSaleem, the edits made by you and Patriotic Gamer made the template too big for an infobox and the formatting was not as professional-looking as the original version. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 16:41, July 1, 2021 (EDT)

Citation tag banner

(this discussion has been moved to Talk:Infinity denial)

Got it started

There, got it started. We need the Senate page cause people like Val Demings and Tim Ryan are running for Senate. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 20:56, August 25, 2021 (EDT)

Alright, awesome! I'll get to creating content related to the 2022 midterms soon; I still got some more pages to create on past Eastern Tennessee Republican figures, and maybe for some U.S. senators in the mid-1900s as well. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 20:58, August 25, 2021 (EDT)

You got 50,000 hits last time, you could get 150,000 hits by election day if you get going on it now. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 20:59, August 25, 2021 (EDT)

I'm not that optimistic about a page view count going past tens of thousands even if I constantly update such a large and important article because of how our page view growth has declined, but maybe you're right. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 21:01, August 25, 2021 (EDT)

I wouldn't worry about that. You built a readership last year who kept returning for updates as the election approached. The weakness was thin content cause you didn't give yourself enough time. You have several advantages now: (1) basic formatting is complete; (2) a loyal following; (3) most importantly you can provide almost daily updates on any particular race which Ballotpedia does not have, nor even Wikipedia. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 00:07, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

I suppose that's a fair point. I always scour for interesting and notable details related to the campaign WP often doesn't seem to include in their articles on elections. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 00:10, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

Here's a shortcut method: Cut n past out the two large articles into user draft space. Then go line by line and remove open seats. Then edit incumbants running for re-eelction; You can retain party and name, but remove the rest, including primary challengers, etc. You get the idea. On the Senate page, you'll need to do more formatting cause some states that weren't in last time will be in this time, etc. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 00:17, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

Eh, maybe. I generally don't like copy/pasting blocks of text and prefer to word sentences distinctly in different articles by writing them from the top of my head. The only times I'm mostly inclined to copy/paste stuff are citations I add in. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 00:19, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

I'm taking about all the ==sublevel== formatting - that's all done.

Ballotpedia probably updates their articles maybe three times a year, and has a staff working on all. Wikipedia, for most of the unknowns, has just local enthusiasts in their district working on them, although they probably have a larger project that supervises and helps with copyediting. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 00:23, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

If the page were ever to get too big and unwieldy because of all the sublevel formatting, then you begin spinoffs --United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections, California 2020 or somesuch title. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 00:28, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

Ah, I see. I'll try to remember to take all that into consideration later on when I get to constant adding and updating content on the 2022 midterms. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Thursday, 00:33, August 26, 2021 (EDT)

Oops...

I was busy working on getting those templates added in the People's Party of Canada page and hadn't noticed at that point that you had already removed those references for pushing an LPOV. Sorry about the signals getting crossed. Northwest (talk) 21:24, September 20, 2021 (EDT)

You're fine in this instance, no worries. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Tuesday, 21:25, September 20, 2021 (EDT)

Scheller

[6] Read it. This is what happens when you jump the gun on a developing story. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 14:29, October 5, 2021 (EDT)

I can't read the post; it says I need to log in. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Tuesday, 15:08, October 5, 2021 (EDT)

He trashes Trump and Flynn, says Maddog Mattis was gay. While his criticism of Trump is based upon MSM misreporting, he calls Flynn a liar, which is untrue and crosses a line. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 15:34, October 5, 2021 (EDT)

He's fallen into the trap many victims of public school education have fallen into, thinking that there remains any vestiges of honor, integrity, and patriotism on the left. That someone can rise to be a Lt Col in USMC is disconcerting. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 15:43, October 5, 2021 (EDT)

Sorry

Sorry if the categories seemed, unnecessary. I just wanted to make that giant category more clean and organized. sorry. ChadUser (talk) 13:43, October 16, 2021 (EDT)

How do i become an admin

im curious because u said its more then just adding a box --Superbanana (talk) 19:33, November 1, 2021 (EDT)

See here; being an admin means you have the "Administrator" tag. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Monday, 19:45, November 1, 2021 (EDT)

What does the message in your signature mean?

Hi LT, what does "May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!" mean? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChenXiansheng (talk)

That was my previous signature for a long while. "D.C." referred to User:Dataclarifier and "I.S." referred to User:IndependentSkeptic; both were devout Catholics who participated in lengthy debates with RobSmith from the spring to fall of last year. From what they've told me, they're advanced in age, and I would hope they're still all alive and well, especially Dataclarifier's mother. Thanks for reminding me of this. —LT ^{(The Old Right was right!)} Monday, 11:30, December 20, 2021 (EST)

Go ahead

Place your reverted comment on my talk page. I already complained to Andy about it. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 15:18, December 9, 2022 (EST)

Vox Day article additions

Vox Day has supporters who are lawyers. And one or more lawsuits related to Vox Day and his supporters/friends have been launched such as THIS ONE. So don't add anything in the Vox Day article that is not proveable. I was very careful to put unproveable claims in the article. Conservative (talk) 22:13, December 13, 2022 (EST)

Okay then, thanks for the heads-up. —LT ^{(Exodus 23:2)} Wednesday, 22:16, December 13, 2022 (EST)

HERE is another example of his some of Vox Day's supporters being lawyers and being perfectly happy to sue people as far as defamation against Vox Day. Conservative (talk) 22:20, December 13, 2022 (EST)

One last thing. Vox Day had more visibility in the past due to his anti-atheism book and anti-atheism activities in the past and his past involvement in the alt-right. But his prominence has greatly waned as can be seen in this Google Trends graph: Vox Day - Google Trends. I wouldn't spend too much time on him. I am not going to be writing about a secular leftist wiki subsequently due to their public profile waning. It's better to write evergreen content (content that is timeless) or writing on things that people are currently interested in. Given modern air travel and immigration, America and the world is becoming more multiracial every day and Vox Day's railing against interracial romantic relationships will be seen more and more as antiquated racial bigotry. Conservative (talk) 22:33, December 13, 2022 (EST)

Re your interesting work

Re your interesting work on Anti-Semitism

• Of earlier classic, anti-Semitism [the idea], was Haman, in the book of Esther (3:6) - and actually a genocidal one.here or here.

• Paul Shmidt on Antisemitism before Hitler, in Austria vs in Germany.May 13, 1945 (The original article in PDF before his mame was misspelled by automatic digital conversation). I don't know how right he was, but that was his opinion. Per Alfons Heck his tale about (circa 1936) his childhood, it might have been different.

• As history showed, this ancient bigotry is a default one, and when it appears strongly, it is always "adjusted" to the 'current' situation as justification in finding "reasons."

Regards.Telling (talk)

[EC] Thanks, Telling. Ultimately, the origins of antisemitism, one of the world's oldest forms of bigotry, seem to be motivated by envy/coveting, since Jews were God's first chosen people. And I appreciate the shared biblical knowledge with the linked Esther verse, since I haven't finished studying most of the Old Testament yet. (Now, as for the topic of Jew-hatred in Europe, antisemitism by the 19th and 20th centuries came from different ideologies across the political spectrum. My impression from limited research so far is that while it earlier was perpetrated probably mostly by "right-wingers" associated with monarchy, it later became increasingly manifested from the left as well with the rise of socialist movements like Marxism and Nazism.)

Anyways, I must say, your analysis of the big picture is splendid and evidently grounded in wisdom. —LT ^{(Exodus 23:2)} Tuesday, 00:09, December 20, 2022 (EST)

First, thanks for your kind words. In essence, the entire subject is very delicate and too vast for me to cover. There is also the factor of seed of a default bigotry - then the expansion/exacerbation...Telling (talk)

Maintenance chores

You're making a mess in the Double Redirects. It'll be your job to clean it up. Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:05, December 28, 2022 (EST

LT, I fixed the majority of them for you. Conservative (talk) 09:58, January 3, 2023 (EST)

It seems that you deleted a slew of double redirects, leaving too many redlinks. Now I'll have to either adjust such broken links, or recreate the redirects, which may be more feasible since those pages have been under those old titles for many years and are what many likely have been used to. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Tuesday, 12:11, January 3, 2023 (EST)

The ones I deleted were orphan pages that were not being used. I believe I checked for all of them before deleting them. I did not delete the remaining ones because I wasn't sure what was going on as far as those and that you could be deal with them best since you are more familiar with them and what you wanted to achieve with them. Conservative (talk) 13:05, January 3, 2023 (EST)

The easiest way to hand this is, when creating a Redirect, check right away to see if it's a Double Redirect, rather than letting them pile up. Readers may encounter difficulty and confusion trying to access you hard work. Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 03:00, January 7, 2023 (EST)

I deleted the article on the obscure British socialist

As per your request, I deleted the article on the obscure British socialist. Conservative (talk) 18:43, January 7, 2023 (EST)

Thanks. IMO, Conservapedia should focus more on providing well-written articles about politics, history, and other educational topics as opposed to 24/7 coverage about a random echo chamber swamp of third-rate trolls. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Saturday, 18:51, January 7, 2023 (EST)

Note on "Aspies"

That big wheel we've discussed at RW is a "high functioning Aspie". Evidently, he, or his opponents in the debate, brought their debate here from both Wikipedia and RW. It's only one such example, albeit a rather personal one for the RW hotshot. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:20, January 9, 2023 (EST)

Ah, I see. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Tuesday, 22:22, January 9, 2023 (EST)

Note: This controversy or argument on internet discussions predates Wikipedia, and the lines were drawn between groups of users many decades ago (like in Usenet). RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:20, January 9, 2023 (EST)

Okay. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Tuesday, 22:27, January 9, 2023 (EST)

Re Cat.

Dear LT, Thanks for your work. May I humbly note that, this is how the Cat. Was before VS now most is removed. Thanks. Regards.Telling (talk)

We'll need a robot to fix it. My suggestion: Turn the Redirect around and stick with the old Category title (until such a time as we get somebody who can program and operate a robot, and we get organized enough on Proper Naming Conventions.) Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 01:31, January 11, 2023 (EST)

Thanks.Telling (talk)

Hmm, it seems that RobSmith has now moved the category back to the spelling "Anti-Semitism." No matter how many facts I can show him demonstrating that the equating of Jews with "Semites" is an archaic fallacy, he stubbornly insists on including the dash and capital "s" simply because Wikipedia uses the proper spelling, and therefore Conservapedia should do otherwise. On this particular matter, I'll get back to it sometime later. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Wednesday, 14:23, January 11, 2023 (EST)

Dear LT and Rob, I respect you both. Without getting into the correct spelling, how do we get the category to include all that had been contained in the Category - in case of revert?Telling (talk)

Well, due to the large number of articles contained in the category, changing them manually would be tediously time-consuming, so potentially using a bot to execute the task instead would be magnitudes more efficient. Unfortunately, I don't know how to operate a bot. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Wednesday, 15:07, January 11, 2023 (EST)

Meantime I did this test..Telling (talk) 15:46, January 11, 2023 (EST)

For category links, it's my understanding that for any phrase you place after a vertical bar in the form of [[Category:Example|et cetera]], then that page will be ordered in the category page under a section with the title "et cetera." —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Wednesday, 15:52, January 11, 2023 (EST)

Which is why I put both separately at that example, just in case.Telling (talk)

Ah, alright, I see. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Wednesday, 17:18, January 11, 2023 (EST)

LT, Prof. Jensen created the category. [7] Why don't you contact him for his thinking on the matter and see if anything has happened in the past 10 years to change his thinking on the matter. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 05:24, January 15, 2023 (EST)

Sure. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Sunday, 10:53, January 15, 2023 (EST)

I haven't studied this matter in any significant detail. A quick internet search turned up a few tidbits, such as "Some scholars and activists advocate the term anti-Semitism be de-hyphenated, spelling it instead as antisemitism. Advocates for the hyphen’s removal argue that the change may help dispel pseudoscientific notions of a 'Semitic race' and belief in the existence of a derivative 'Semitism.'" (from Britannica) What is the root of this debate, then? --DavidB4 ^(TALK) 01:01, January 15, 2023 (EST)

Desecularization article

I know you produce a lot of good content and that is why I recommended that you be made an admin.

The main reason I removed your addition to the desecularization article is because it was incorrectly formatted. I fixed the formatting and put in a sentence that you added. Conservative (talk) 02:16, January 15, 2023 (EST)

I looked at the video and it was just some YouTuber speculatimng about a verse in Daniel about an explosion of knowledge and travel. I agree Daniel wrote about an explosion of knowledge and travel. But the verse doesn't say anything about an explosion of religion. This isn't sound Bible exegesis. It is the work of some YouTube layman without theological training. It's not suitable for an encylopedia article. I am removing it.

But I do know you are very capable of producing excellent content like I noted above. Conservative (talk) 05:22, January 15, 2023 (EST)

I mentioned a resource to you about Bible exegesis. While it is on New Testament Bible exegesis, its methodology can be used as far as Old Testament Bible exegesis. Here is the resource: Basic Rules for New Testament Exegesis. One principle is "Confirm the limits of the passage". If the passage in Daniel is about an explosion of knowledge and travel, you can't assume that means there will be an explosion of religion. For example, the people in the UK are more knowledgeable about a great many things than their ancestors, yet they are more irreligious than their ancestors. Conservative (talk) 05:32, January 15, 2023 (EST)

I appreciate your recommendation for my adminship.

Now, in particular response to your removal of my addition, I find it ironic that you not only cite a white supremacist Nazsymp, but that call my removal of those references as committing the "genetic fallacy," and then go about branding my citation of a Christian saint as "not suitable." Furthermore, what do you mean by "theological training," and how do you know that Bible Flock Box is not qualified enough? Greg Sereda, who runs the channel, demonstrates a concise understanding of Scripture, so if that's not "theological training," you're evidently implying that extrabiblical man-made doctrines are needed. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Sunday, 10:52, January 15, 2023 (EST)

When I cited that person, he was a conservative and not alt-right. People change for the better or worse and in this case this person changed for the worse. Anyways, I do have a plan to fix that issue, but right now I am in the midst of two projects.

Anyways, there is a wrong way to do Bible exegesis using the historical-grammatical method in order to get the writer's intent and there is a wrong way. Unfortunately, that YouTuber was more concerned with his own intentions than the writer's intentions. Conservative (talk) 11:04, January 15, 2023 (EST)

The Bible is to be understood in a proper manner, not requiring the extensive doctrines of uninspired men. Sereda is applying Daniel 12:4 in a straightforward manner, since the increase of faith towards the end of the world in preparation for the return of Christ makes plenty more sense than the notion that it pertains to increased travel. As for your citation of the particular alt-right lunatic, it may be true that your initial references of him were at a time when he was simply a conservative. However, now that you clearly know he's an alt-right bigot, you shouldn't be citing him, yet still are. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Sunday, 11:10, January 15, 2023 (EST)

I cited him in a number of places. I will find a replacement and I already have a few ideas on how to do that. Unfortunately, I cannot turn on a dime in this matter.

As for the other matter, I put a ton of effort into that article and I am just making the reasonable request not to have some YouTuber's speculation which is not based on sound Bible exegesis. With speculation, you can make any Bible verse unmoored from the author's original intent. Conservative (talk) 11:21, January 15, 2023 (EST)

[EC] Well, assuming you'll keep true to your past numerous statements about how you'll soon be less active on Conservapedia for a long while, one wonders just how lengthy of an amount of time it shall take for you to fully remove all citations to that particular alt-right bigot. When I removed it from one of your more recent page creations, you brazenly put it back in and locked the article.

On Scripture topics, anything not adhering to whatever the "exegesis" says is not encyclopedic? Well, I wonder what the saints in Heaven will think about that. Furthermore, I suppose by that logic, if the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts don't convey the message the exegesis says, it's the fault of the manuscript writers. —LT ^{(Mark 8:36)} Sunday, 11:24, January 15, 2023 (EST)

I did allow myself to get sidetracked, but there are some things I am doing that will keep my focus/prioritization on matters that I wish to attend to in order to keep my various commitments. Conservative (talk) 12:03, January 15, 2023 (EST)

Recent blocks

Do you think all three of these deserve the maximum without warning? One perhaps, but the other two are questionable. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:11, January 23, 2023 (EST)

So then, did you review the activities of those users before coming the conclusion that the blocks are "questionable"? —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 19:13, January 23, 2023 (EST)

On today's activity, in a cursory manner. I've been reviewing their activity over the past year for the past week. Do you really believe handing out the maximum without warning will stop or encourage sock activity? You're back to playing the same silly game an Admin whose name started with a K did, that had destructive effects for the project. Especially if it's motivated by personal animus for treatment recieved on another website. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:19, January 23, 2023 (EST)

What evidence do you have those two users deserve 6 month blocks without warning? RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:43, January 23, 2023 (EST)

For example, you blocked the editor with the maximum without warning, but left in his most egregious conduct, i.e. a link to a porno site [8] (Note how it's formatted, www.xvi<!-- Nope -->deos.com to mask the site). This makes it look like you didn't do a thorough review of the activity, which of course is not always possible. But in the end, you treated two users with scant evidence of misconduct the same as a user who inserted a link to a porno site, while leaving the link intact. Is that fair? RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:21, January 23, 2023 (EST)

"Silly game"? That's rich, coming from the admin who undid my block of a troll who inserted white supremacist "great replacement" propaganda and undid my efforts to remove it! And if you think that my supposed motivations "by personal animus" are unwarranted, just take a look at what Jesus said. It's hinted at in my signature! :)

What evidence do I have? It's self-explanatory, and not my fault if you refuse to look into it yourself. You're an administrator, after all.

Yes, I noticed the clever evasion tactics used. And why did I treat them all the same? That's something you can figure out yourself, since you ought to be intelligent enough. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 20:58, January 23, 2023 (EST)

You're a big boy now, running with the big boys. Don't take suggestions on how to be an effective Admin as personal slights or criticism. Are you going to (a) justify those two blocks with evidence, (b) undo or lower the duration with some evidence, or (c) make me do it after 6 hours? RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 21:16, January 23, 2023 (EST)

You, me, and Cons have all been victims of unfair blocks at another wiki. So we know how it feels. That is not in and of itself cause for blocking here at CP. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 21:55, January 23, 2023 (EST)

If you're going to symp for RW trolling and parole the blatant culprits, I can't properly stop you. As for evidence, here's a few examples:

• SingleChristian1:
  • the Mulford Act page creation is a narrative distortion to glamorize a gun control bill as "anticommunist"
  • the Abby Zwerner page creation is an utter lying politicization

The Mitford Act can be edited. Abby Zimmer should be tagged with Category:Uncategorized for further maintenance and review. Neither is cause for a warning or maximum block without discussion first. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:13, January 23, 2023 (EST)

• DanAP:
  • removing content (here) with bizarre justifications
  • trolling in the CBP
  • removing content

There is some justification here for rebuke, some of it is minor. In all three instances cited, there was no effort at engagement or warning. Perhaps a shortened block is warranted. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:13, January 23, 2023 (EST)

The case of DanAP is interesting; he evidently had Blocking rights at one time, which apparently were rescinded. [9] I'll go along with the 6 month block for now. However, a case like this should be brought to my or Andy's attention. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:31, January 23, 2023 (EST)

I see. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 22:36, January 23, 2023 (EST)

As for your above criticism of me not removing/reverting it all yet, I'll be eager to do it manually once I get rollback and delete powers (preferably mass-delete as well), because otherwise it's too tediously time-consuming. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 22:02, January 23, 2023 (EST)

So you saw the porno link and left it intact? RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:13, January 23, 2023 (EST)

Find someone else to peddle your concern trolling to. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 22:34, January 23, 2023 (EST)

There was one other matter I wanted to discuss with you privately. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:37, January 23, 2023 (EST)

Meantime, reread Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility: "Avoid bringing up irrelevant past disputes with editors and stick to the content dispute at hand." You are to be an example to other editors in how to engage in discussion on talk pages to resolve problems. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:42, January 23, 2023 (EST)

I left a message on Aschlafly's talk page about the parodist SingleChristian1

I left a message on Aschlafly's talk page about the parodist SingleChristian1. Conservative (talk) 20:54, February 11, 2023 (EST)

Yep, I just noticed. Thanks, Conservative. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Sunday, 21:01, February 11, 2023 (EST)

Reread Guidelines, please

Conservapedia:Guidelines#Civility

• For content disputes, be reasonable and make every effort to use an article's talk page to have a cordial and constructive dialogue. Stick to the facts and avoid extraneous and impertinent arguments. Back up your facts with a source or sources. If you are proposing alternative content in a content dispute, it must be sourced. Do not engage in personal attacks. Do not put User names in subheadings to gang up on an editor or hold up to ridicule.... [10]

Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:31, February 16, 2023 (EST)

Good improvement

Good improvement to the template! Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 15:09, April 9, 2023 (EDT)

No problem at all! And happy Resurrection Sunday! —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Sunday, 15:10, April 9, 2023 (EDT)

Question

How come signature says Sunday April 22 when April 22 is actually Saturday? Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 00:57, April 23, 2023 (EDT)

That is due to time zones which the wiki database relies on. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Sunday, 10:20, April 23, 2023 (EDT)

Steve Turley

Steve Turley may have given your article a boost. "the religion of Faucism". You should include the reference, cited by name, in the article and with a link. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 13:16, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

Thanks for pointing it out, though I can't say I'm nearly as interested in exposing fascism- er, I mean, Faucism, as I did one and a half years ago. Also, I wasn't the first to use the neologism, so Turley may not have found out about the term from us. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 14:15, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

I'd wager he read the article. Many conservative commentators pursue CP looking for unique content. The least you can do is return the favor with reverse internal and external links. This is how you build readership and following. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 15:06, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

To reiterate, I no longer hold interest in this subject, so you may feel free to improve that article. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 15:48, April 25, 2023 (EDT)

You may be interested....

Decomposing the Rise of the Populist Radical Right: How Changes in Priorities Explain the Electoral Politics of Our Time. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:47, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

Just skimmed through it; I find it interesting that "right-wing" populism apparently appeals to non-union workers, when the phenomenon in the U.S. made inroads to blue-collar unions under Trump. It's probably the standard Marxist propaganda branding their "fascist" opponents as "anti-union." —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 16:03, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

I find it funny. This is a big scholarly research report, whereas all you need to do is substitute "low IQ voter" for "populism", whether left or right over the past several decades to get the same results. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 16:52, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

Labels are ridiculous. For example "left" is supposedly for "change" or "revolution", whereas by its own definitions it would be "reactionary" to "capitalism". RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 16:59, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

They're fun to use though—for example, the leftists advocating a return to Roe v. Wade are now reactionaries! —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 17:05, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

Bingo! Amen! You got it! RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 17:13, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

And what more could be considered "revolutionary transformational change" than upping the birthrate by outlawing abortion? RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 17:15, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

So then it becomes a discussion of "freedom" and "women's rights", whereas it's really just about "selfishness" and "greed" when "more advanced", "economically developed" countries and "rising incomes" leads to lower birthrates. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 17:20, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

[EC] This is why labels—clarifying political designations—are important, because utilizing them properly enables defeating leftists with their own tools. They construct certain pejoratives such as "reactionary" with such astounding vagueness, leaving a loophole that allows the terminology to be thrown right back at them. And that's how you defeat the left: using their own weapons against them. So if they accuse of you propagating "white nationalist Great Replacement propaganda," tell them that the people who invented the hoax were leftists. If they say that opposing abortion disproportionately impacts minorities, just respond, "oh, so you want more black babies to be killed? How racist of you!" If they call you a Nazi, say, "oh, so you're saying I'm a socialist like yourself?" Compare them to the very collectives they attempt to associate you with. The right followed this tactic during the Tea Party era by comparing gun control, abortion, homosexuality, etc. to Nazis, and the left was given some headaches. Unfortunately, this was abandoned once politics shifted to the radical populism of Trumpism, and the right abandoned conservatism for socialism, giving heed to collectivist propaganda and gradually associating with left-wing (old school) white nationalist canards.

Also, labels are highly beneficial as long as you adequately comprehend their connotation, historical context, common usages, etc., because if you use a dozen jargon terms in a single sentence, it demonstrates well-versed knowledge. For example, if I were running for office as an old-school Republican to dethrone an incumbent "right-wing" populist, I'd call myself a "Stalwart" and castigate them as socialistic big-government nanny-state progressives. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 17:25, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

The "left" is behind Ukrainian fascism. That's abundantly clear.

China is a good example. When it imposed the one child policy in recent memory, the theory was overpopulation leads to poverty. Now "economic development" threatens extinction of the nation with a "sub-replacement level" birth rate. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 17:38, May 1, 2023 (EDT)

I sent you a short message

I sent you a short message. Conservative (talk) 21:36, May 19, 2023 (EDT

Some items you may be interested in

I noticed that you had recently begun a section on labor unions and racism. Something interesting I found a while ago that could be added to that section is the following which shows how minimum wage laws were once favored a long time ago by racists back in the day. I didn't know whether you planned to add this to the section or not. I apologize for the long string of sources, but just thought you might be interested in it. [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] -Mr. Nationalist (talk) 00:03, May 23, 2023 (EDT)

Wow, sounds like plenty to write about, and on a subject I didn't know before. Thanks! —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 00:05, May 23, 2023 (EDT)

More than happy. I stumbled across this a long time ago and thought you may be interested. Just like gun control, minimum wage laws were favored by racists a long time ago. -Mr. Nationalist (talk) 00:11, May 23, 2023 (EDT)

Yep, I'm most certainly intrigued to not only check out those links soon, but also research even more into the topic of minimum wage laws and racism now that you've brought it up. Contemporary leftists want to talk about the history of systemic racism, so let's address it indeed! —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 00:15, May 23, 2023 (EDT)

Some stuff may be redundant, but when researching a topic I generally like get as much ammunition as possible. These articles talk a lot about the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, which occurred when a contractor employed African-American workers from Alabama to build a hospital in the district of Congressman Robert Bacon. Appalled that blacks from the South were working on a federal project in his district, Representative Robert Bacon of Long Island submitted H.R. 17069. As most blacks were not in unions at the time (as they were excluded) and were considered cheap labor, this act was designed to discourage the hiring of colored employees. Representative John Cochran from Missouri himself stated, “I have received numerous complaints in recent months about southern contractors employing low-paid colored mechanics getting work and bringing the employees from the South.” revealing the motivations of the act. -Mr. Nationalist (talk) 01:06, May 23, 2023 (EDT)

'If you don't believe in hell, then you don't believe in an afterlife'

The latest from Sam Gerrans: Modern Secular Society Admits It Is Going To Hell. I'd go a step further and call it 'carnality'. he also has some interesting comments on 'democracy'. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 17:00, May 28, 2023 (EDT)

Perhaps I'll watch the full thing later. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Sunday, 17:21, May 28, 2023 (EDT)

Max Blumenthal

Maybe you'll have a different view of Max Blumenthal after seeing this brief clip. This whole Ukraine project of NATO and the West is rapidly turning into the farce it was destined to be since whatever idiot thought it up. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 04:18, June 3, 2023 (EDT)

Update:

• Max Blumenthal confronts Rachel Maddow
• The Grayzone debates National Endowment for Democracy VP on group's CIA ties
• U.S. Elites Testing Ukraine War Funding App, SOCIAL CONTROL Coming Next? Max Blumenthal
• Ukraine's dystopian digital snitching app premiers in DC
• Max Blumenthal On Rising: USAID Director Says QUIET PART OUT LOUD Re: Ukraine Funding (USAID director is Libyan slave trader Samantha Power).

All this is just the past 4 days.

Suggestion: If you are going to involve yourself in contemporary news and reporting, I suggest you involve yourself in some substance. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:18, June 3, 2023 (EDT)

Side note: the DC conference where Blumenthal confronted Lockheed Martin and Maddow is the group that trained Pete Buttigieg as a Democrat "foreign policy and national security" expert. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:22, June 3, 2023 (EDT)

"What is TruCon" "Well, first of all, it's a true con." Okay, that part got me, I'll concede. I see the point you're implying, that Blumenthal is fighting against the establishment left's lies. Let's look at the larger picture though: what is the thesis, antithesis, and planned synthesis here?

The thesis is the pro-Ukraine establishment, serving the current order of globalist elite. The antithesis is a coalition of Putinists, socialists, anarchists, Communists, antiwar libertarians, "right-wing populists," the alt-right, etc. rallying behind Russia under the banner of isolationist nationalism (i.e. rhetoric like "why are we funding Ukraine when Americans are starving," used to promote domestic welfare programs) and anti-Ukrofascism. See how Satan is manipulating the world like the puppets it's comprised of? Satan currently props up the thesis, Ukraine shills, and letting their flagrant evil increasingly go on full display. When the world grows appalled at the globalist order, they will rally behind the antiwar Putinist coalition, in America solid among "right-wing populists." Satan then uses the "right-wing populists"/"Christian Nationalists," who are back in power, to install the Sunday Law, which will arrive under the banner of "restoring Christian morality." An unholy syncretism of left and right will emerge as Jesuits, infiltrating a wide spectrum of institutions, draw support for "Sunday rest" from numerous perspectives, from conservatives extolling "Christian values" to neo-Marxist leftists exhorting the need to reduce consumption and "climate change" via Sunday rest as Satan escalates natural disasters. And because mainstream Christianity promotes immediate judgment, there will be increased susceptibility to spiritist occultism as most people refuse to accept soul sleep, paving the way for demonic false signs as the Bible says. (Rev. 16:13–14) Just as Satan divides, he will ultimately unite; the world will rally behind a new order, resulting in a final system neither fully capitalist nor Communist, entirely left nor right, establishment globalist nor "right-wing populist." It'll be a new fully syncretized order—a New World Order—the final culmination of man at his naked despotism.

Satan doesn't always deceive people the most by telling an entire lie; he takes the truth out of context to the point of flagrant deception and adds a false spin to it. In the Garden of Eden, Satan told Eve that her eyes would be opened if she ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and Gen. 3:7 says of Adam and Eve that "the eyes of them both were opened" after they ate it. That's now sneaky the devil is—he mixes truth with lies and pushes a false, alluring narrative. And that's how the beast system will come—it will be done in the name of a worthy cause, denouncing the blatant evils of one side and promising glory. Unfortunately, most of the Protestant world doesn't understand this, picturing the Antichrist as a future individual entering an Israeli temple and openly declaring war on God's people direct and outright. Oh, that reminds me, did you know that Futurism was invented by Jesuit Francisco Ribera as part of the Counter-Reformation to water down the influence of Historicism among Protestants? That tells you all you need to know—Romanist Papists didn't like being identified as the Antichrist, so they commissioned propagandists to confuse (ah yes, and Babylon means confusion) the world with false doctrines—Luis del Alcázar purported that the Antichrist came in the past, and Ribera claimed that it would appear in the future when it's been in existence since 538 A.D., receiving its deadly wound in 1798 and slowly gaining its power back especially when Fascist Italy and it signed the Lateran Treaty.

You see how the beast system will form? It won't be establishment Ukronazsymp globalists, nor Russia, nor China, nor Iran, nor a random Jewish guy entering a third temple in Israel. It'll be installed by "Christian Nationalists" among the "right-wing populist" ranks who ride the wave to power on the currently fomenting syncretic antiwar coalition. Wake up!!! —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Sunday, 11:40, June 4, 2023 (EDT)

I don't know about all that. My point was, in an age of few and fewer credible journalists, Max Blumenthal is one of the very few credible, professional journalists who is actually reporting on the vital issues that matter of our day rather than churning out propaganda BS as most all of his professional journalist colleagues are. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 00:36, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

My emphasis is on the larger picture in terms of what the NATO–Ukraine War is serving the purpose of and why. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 10:49, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Oh. Give me the name of one qualified professional journalist other than Max Blumenthal you use or rely on to form your own personal impressions about the Ukraine war? I bet you can't. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:36, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Indeed I can't, I admit, because I don't delve enough into the Natomite War as you do. Perhaps The Jewish Press makes for a good source. I'm more concerned about the long-run, seeing the NWO culmination we're approaching. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 19:56, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

The Jewish Press? Yes and no. Last week the fired Ukraine chief propagandist, Alexei Arestovich (he got fired for admitting the truth that a Ukrainian missile defense rocket hit an apartment complex killing civilians, not Russian "deliberate targeting civilians") laid out in a public forum in Israel a proposal how to "re-educate" the 97% Russian population of Crimea in concentration camps by dividing them into groups of which can be reeducated and which need to be exterminated.

So Arestovich is already planning his escape route to Tel Aviv when Kyiv falls; Zelensky going to Italy or Israel is hotly debated right now. I'd presume the Ukie defense minister Reznikov has likewise settled on going to Israel. Maybe Poroshenko, too. These guys are all wanted nazi war criminals right now. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:35, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Interesting; I hope all that is actually true and verifiable. Anyways, why do you leave "Nazi" in lowercase? Aren't both "Nazi" and "Communist" ought to be capitalized? —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 20:47, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Capitalized refers to the official party and its membership; lowercase refers to the generalized sentiments and ideology among individuals and groups in whatever era (unofficial party members).

Arestovich in his own words. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:54, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Now hold on, traditionally both "Nazi" and "Communist" were always left capitalized. Also, about the Arestovich video, why would he just say that so loud and openly? —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 22:16, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Clearly there is a large enough pro-NATO pro-Ukraine anti-Russian audience in Israel with the appropriate propaganda apparatuses to make itself heard.

Communim and Nazism capitalized as a Proper Noun refers specifically to a time-honored convention; lower case is more of a verb referring to a sentiment held by a group to a bygone era. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 23:22, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Wow, even many Israeli Jews are brainwashed by globalist propaganda in spite of how virulently anti-Jewish the Ukrofascists are?

Hmm, in current times, "Communist" is left uncapitalized most of the time while "Nazi" is always capitalized, though I suppose your reasoning makes some sense, and at least is more consistent. I just like leaving both capitalized, namely for "Communist," to demonstrate my archreactionary credentials. :) —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 23:28, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

The whole issue of hate crime legislation initiated in the Soviet Union, the issue was not hate against any particular group (like Jews, for example) but rather hate in the heart of an individual to motivate violence against any persons of a perceived different group motivated by those differences.

As to the capitalization, you can avoid arguments about contradictions and inconsistencies with the historical record by not capitalizing and refer specifically to the sentiments of a person or group in contemporary life. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 23:45, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Soviet "hate crime" legislation is something our "progressive democrat" legislators made part of "American democracy". Thar's why it's a joke and a farce to hear those same progressive Democrats call Putin a communist or allege Putin wants to recreate the Soviet Union (it's already been recreated here in America and the West, which Putin and Russia want no part of). RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 03:13, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

The progressive Democrats accuse Putin of Communism? I think the left tends to accuse the Putinist Regime of fascism, not Communism. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 11:12, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

As usual, they are far from authorities on anything, don't know what they are talking about, and follow instructions. We have too many just like that in positions of leadership in the conservative movement. RobS^{Give Peace a chance}

Absolutely agreed on that point. All these "right-wing populists" leading the de facto "conservative movement" are a complete joke. Their common talking point now is complaining of "antiwhite racism," which plays into the hands of the neo-Marxists as intended from the beginning, and are no more than rebranded old-school progressives when it comes to supporting immigration restriction, "America First" (coined by progressive godfather Woodrow Wilson), working-class populism, etc. etc. Ideally, the conservative movement needs to be purged of these progressive left-wing Trumpists and restored to true archreactionary conservatism. "Right-wing populists" are just pathetic commies and Comsymps. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 12:00, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

Me personally, I don't want to fall victim to the divide and rule tactics of the globalists and oligarchs. I simply do not believe the typical Ukrainian regards gay marriage as bringing democracy. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 12:31, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

Uh, can you please perhaps clarify a bit more? —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 12:37, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

A "left-right" division is an imperfect paradigm to view the world. I don't want to biased against a person or group simply because somebody else labelled them "left" or "right". God looks upon the heart. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:11, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

In the end, the left-right paradigm is only a theory. If a person calls themselves a 'leftist", fine, I'll accept that. But I've never heard of anybody {with possible exception of the Pravy Sektor) calling themselves a "rightist". RobS^{Give Peace a chance}

Why does the Ukrofascist Pravy Sektor purportedly identify as "rightist" anyways, considering that Nazism is a form of socialism? —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 14:27, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

Because the Pravy Sektor is entirely a "leftist' construct (as the whole left-right paradigm is a leftist construct).

It ought to be obvious that globalist fascists promote and exploit ethnic and racial hatred, often where it didn't even exist prior, to advance their own economic interests under "divide and rule". RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:33, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

Me personally, I view people who identify as "leftist", and subscribe to the left-right paradigm, for the most part as deluded. That doesn't make me a "rightist', or place me on the right side of their delusions. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:40, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

Left and right seem to be biblical concepts; see Ecc. 10:2 and Matthew 25. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 14:43, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

(ec) Leftism, from which the left-right paradigm was born, is a lot like transgenderism; it's a make-pretend world. "Let's pretend I'm a woman." "Let's pretend I'm a good guy and you're a Nazi," etc. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:46, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

Update: Must be doing something right: UK Police DETAIN, INTERROGATE Grayzone Journalist Over Ukraine, NATO Reporting. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 03:35, June 8, 2023 (EDT)

You know... maybe Conservative was on to something with bashing the UK. The only problem is that his approach is all wrong. It's about time for me to take the baton now. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Thursday, 10:37, June 8, 2023 (EDT)

Here's a good starting point: Britain can thrive as a vassal state. We need a good Vassal state article. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 11:45, June 8, 2023 (EDT)

Kudos

Great job on [c.p.].Telling (talk) 17:43, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Thank you! There actually may still be a few more details I'll add to the page later. :) —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 18:09, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

You might like this article on court packing: https://www.city-journal.org/article/out-of-whack-indeed Conservative (talk) 18:35, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Thanks; this, along with a load of other sources, should be helpful for me to develop the Conservapedia article. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Monday, 18:36, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

I did watch last week liberal-Todd's rant/conclusions [18].Telling (talk) 21:00, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

There seems to be fantastic parallels to the New Deal era, when SCOTUS then also ruled in favor of judicial restraint and triggered the liberals of that era, leading to court-packing proposals. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 22:19, June 5, 2023 (EDT)

Let's hope the political 'pendulum' swings right...Telling (talk)

Well, here's the problem with our modern-day definitions of "left" and "right": the "right," ever since the 1930s/40s, has been defined not on its own principles but the "left-wing politics" it opposes. Hence, since the concept of "liberal" has changed, so has the concept of "conservative" likewise, and right-wing politics has become corrupted by elements which simply drifted "rightward" because they were disenchanted with the increasing neo-Marxist direction of leftism.

At the point of our era, what we consider "right-wing" would've been "progressive" a century ago. Working-class–centered sentiments, populist nationalism, "put America first before other countries" (which correlates to support for government action, rather than individual action, to fix the country's problems), disdain for big business, support for immigration restriction, etc. were hallmarks of the old Progressive Movement and currently, of the "right-wing populist" cause.

One of the key tools of Satan is syncretism. In the Old Testament, the devil united various enemies of God to attack Israel, and in the New Testament, he unified the Pharisees and Sadducees, Herod and Pilate, Judean and Roman hierarchies, to form the united front that crucified Jesus. In preparation for Armageddon, Satan must first unite all his forces together, which currently is unfolding in the world.

It will the the "right-wing" side (of course, I'd say they're not truly right-wing, just rebranded progressives) that ends up bringing about the soon-to-come end of the world. Satan simply uses the neo-Marxist left and its overt evils to swing the pendulum towards the "right," which he then uses to complete his system. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 11:28, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

IMHO, We are looking (Court = for instance, Kavanaugh vs KBJ and elections = for instance, DeSantis vs Biden. etc.) for the best scenario, relatively. AKA "the lesser of the two e...s." In all, I think the Woke wave is the burning issue.Telling (talk)

Yeah, DeSantis, notwithstanding some issues, is alright on general policy. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 12:11, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

BTW, The 'Baal Shem Tov' (in explaining on Tractate Shabbat) 'The creation of evil-inclination (aka Satan) is intended to incite man from observing good deeds in order to commit transgressions, and this is his role. And by this a person has a free choice and he will receive a reward. However, sometimes the evil inclination paints itself and misleads mankind by showing them that what they are doing is a good deed, when in reality it is an offense.'Telling (talk)

Hmm, I dunno how much of the Talmud is spot-on, though that part sounds mostly correct. It's ultimately faith alone that saves and not works, though Satan indeed leads the world into transgression by presenting sin in a positive light. —LT ^{(Matthew 26:52)} Tuesday, 12:31, June 6, 2023 (EDT)

___

This [19] which made only local news, as it doesn't fit the...narrative.Telling (talk)

Yeah, the MSM is truly pathetic and abominable in their reporting habits, selectively harping over events which conform to its narrative. It was the same way with the media obsession with the death of Jordan Neely; crime has been rampant in liberal cities like NYC, but the neo-Marxists decided to harp on that one specifically because it was an instance where the person who ultimately died was black and the culprit was white. All the dozens upon dozens of black-on-Asian crime goes unreported though, because the MSM wants the country to believe that the prevailing problem is white supremacy. The MSM reporters in 2020 and onwards probably thought to themselves, "whoa, another occurrence of an anti-Asian attack, which must be Trump's faul- oh wait, the perpetrator was the average plantation black redneck, so let's not report on it after all because we can't blame it on Trump." There's also, of course, all the instances of neo-Marxist anti-Jewish agitation on college campuses and Antifa attacking Jews, but that also is just too inconvenient for the neo-Marxist narrative that anti-Jewry is "right-wing."

Of course, if the neo-Marxists are that concerned with white supremacy, they should go protest the White House and its leading puppet whose career was built on the back of anti-integration efforts and who authored a crime bill disproportionately repressing black youth. Oh wait, that would prove that racism is a left-wing trait, so no, they bury it by now. —LT ^{Smash Ukrofascism!} Tuesday, 12:21, June 13, 2023 (EDT)

Unlike the average fringe white supremacist who is honest in their opinion that whites are superior, neo-Marxists mask their own white supremacy under the cloak of "anti-racism." They don't legitimately care about solving racism, merely instead interested in profiting from conflicts to their own personal advantage. The primary beneficiaries are far-left white elitists, while the average POC is told to stick to their own racial/ethnic collective, as efforts of assimilation are constantly vilified; just look at how they treat Nikki Haley.

And remember: is it any surprise that a top BLM foundation leader is highly wealthy? Neo-Marxism, like all socialism, whether Communist, Nazi, National Bolshevist, etc., are a scam to trick the masses for the benefit of a few clever manipulators.

Neo-Marxists have done nothing short of taking up white supremacist mass murderer Dylann Roof's cause of inciting a race war, pitting one racial group against another. They are an abomination upon humanity. Oh, this also reminds me: neo-Marxist leftists like to pretend that abolishing the death penalty is an exemplification of "anti-racism." Well, if no mass murderers can be executed, that means that black family members of individuals killed by white supremacists must pay, through their taxpayer dollars, to finance the food, shelter, and healthcare of the very inhumane beasts who killed their family. Let it sink in: that's exactly what neo-Marxist leftists ultimately are pushing for, feeding the hides of white supremacist mass murderers at the expense of black people. —LT ^{Smash Ukrofascism!} Tuesday, 12:34, June 13, 2023 (EDT)

And on that note of fringe VS fringe (which, needless to say, I'm agaist all extremism). Who is The violent now? Target Stores in Five States Receive Bomb Threats After Removing Some Pride Month Items

Newsmax, June 12, 2023, Jeremy Frankel

Target stores in at least five states were evacuated over the weekend after receiving bomb threats, apparently over their removal of some Pride Month items last month. The Washington Post reported Monday that local news outlets in Louisiana, New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Oklahoma received emails from anonymous people about bomb threats at the locations.

One email sent to Oklahoma City NBC affiliate KFOR listed seven locations in and around the Oklahoma City area and claimed that two of them already had bombs in them, hidden inside the store products. The email read that "the bombs will detonate in several hours, guess which ones have the bombs. Time is ticking," and ended with the date "4/19/1995," which is the date of the Oklahoma City bombing.

This is recent. Re Nikki, she might not be perfect like all humans, but she has a lot of great principles.Telling (talk)

The homosexualist movement has gone off the rails in its extremist insanity, and seems to be a sign of the world coming to a close:

“	Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.	”
—Luke 17:28–30

About Nikki Haley, her stance on the NATO–Ukraine War is detestable, though otherwise, yes, promulgates decent principles. —LT ^{Smash Ukrofascism!} Tuesday, 15:03, June 13, 2023 (EDT)

McCormack-Dickstein Committee

Whenever you decide to return, I'd like to discuss the McCormack-Dickstein Committee, the American labor movement and US-Soviet relations in the New Deal era, and how it relates to common misperceptions of Vladimir Putin and censorship today. Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 08:18, June 22, 2023 (EDT)

For reference, see here: Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/240#Digression_on_CIA_regime_change_operations_in_Russia. Basically, the CIA's regime change operations through USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy, and the Open Society Foundations illegal operations in Russia and throughout the world are all modeled on Comintern and Soviet foreign activities from 1921 to 1991, the final collapse of the USSR. The objective being to subvert and overthrow existing regimes. If Putin censors so-called "independent media" that can be found to receive funding from a US or any foreign entity with the objective of influencing or interfering in its domestic political affairs, the government of Russia or any other government has its own sovereign, legal authority to shut it down. Spewing over and over again, "Putin censors critics" is nothing more than US/Communist propaganda, intended to undermine legitimate institutions. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 08:40, June 22, 2023 (EDT)

This is typical of Soros-funded activities in Moscow, in Kyiv, in Poland, in Hungary, in Macedonia, in Thailand, and throughout the world. If it was purely domestic, it would be a different matter. When it's foreign-funded (with the intent to interfere in a nation';s sovereign domestic political affairs), it is a violation of UN Resolutions and international diplomatic conventions. But the United States thinks it is above international law. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 08:59, June 22, 2023 (EDT)

The above video is little different than Moscow-directed CPUSA labor union organizing activity in the 1930s to subvert American society and institutions. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 09:04, June 22, 2023 (EDT)

You are welcome to participate in our new Debate

@Debate:Is it It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt?. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 19:40, July 9, 2023 (EDT)

Tiny note

A note. Gordon Duff of VT - he is infamous on 911 with bizarre malicious conspiracy theories. He began that trend there, though he was active 2008-2022, his garbage he began, still goes on. Regards.Telling (talk)

Interesting. The Politico article I cited mentions of him:

The site’s chairman, Gordon Duff, served in the Marine Corps in Vietnam and began contributing to the site in 2008. In one 2012 interview, he stated, “About 30% of what’s written on Veterans Today, is patently false. About 40% of what I write, is at least purposely, partially false, because if I didn’t write false information I wouldn’t be alive.”

—LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Tuesday, 22:03, July 10, 2023 (EDT)

Thanks, truth be told, I do remember Neo Nazis posting "theroies" from his site, years ago.Telling (talk)

Post–World War II racial anti-Jewry took a convoluted turn in terms of trying to comprehend its placement on the political spectrum; various fringe groups on both the extreme left and right found common ground. In the case of neo-Nazis, even while National Socialism is an inherent far-left ideology because it's simply racial socialism (as opposed to Marxism as class socialism), it makes sense why many embraced the label of "far-right": leftists were in desperate damage control after worldwide horror at the reaction to the Holocaust, worried that everyday people would associate the consequences of socialism with genocidal, ethnically motivated decibel mass murder.

Thus, the larger group of "orthodox" leftists, increasingly influenced by the neo-Marxist school of thought, rebranded Nazism as "far-right." Well, since neo-Nazis could no longer find any place in the mainstream left because the latter were of such expedient desperation to distance themselves from the Holocaust their ideals paved the road for, some decided to embrace the "right-wing" label some way, shape or form, for their own expedient purposes.

In the case of virulent, anti-Jewish, Holocaust-denying sites like VT, they typically attempt to sound like "right-wing" populists not because they're actually on the right, but because they see the political right as a host to attach onto like a parasite. Unfortunately, this has become too easy nowadays because "right-wing" populists support policies resembling that of the very old-school 1910s-era progressives from which the alt-right is an outgrowth of. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Wednesday, 22:22, July 11, 2023 (EDT)

Telling, did you get all that? Life on planet earth is defined by whether it is "left" or "right", and has to fit neatly into one his little boxes. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:35, July 11, 2023 (EDT)

My analysis is based on careful, extensive research that focuses on the larger picture. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Wednesday, 22:49, July 11, 2023 (EDT)

So what's your objective? Combating antisemitism or placing it on the "correct" side of the political spectrum?

Antismites come in all stripes, liberals, conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, Christians, atheists, etc. Some witting, some unwitting. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 22:57, July 11, 2023 (EDT)

Without getting into the debate, and I do respect both, the most basic Anti-Semitic foundation (after the era of ancient blood libels which today has roots rather not in Europe but in some sections of Arab Islamic world, ironicaly so, it dates back only to 1840s Damascus libel, such as ex Mufti who chose to say he "believes" in it in inciting masses and today for example: Raed Salah) is the forgery "Protocols" [yes, even Nazi Germany made much use of it too, alongside "arianism" while they had "honorary aryan" when strategically it suited them], then all fantasies pop up looking for the boogeyman... to choose out / to pick that particular group for that, but in [spirit-less] "spirit", its the Protocols no matter the outfit... [No matter how Jews are so diverse and some groups/individuals are on the complete opposite of each other in ideology], there is that notion that they all are "connected" and if they "conspire"/ as if there is a "cabal." Heck, even via space laser, for instance]. And of course the ABC of Anti-Semitism is to connect negativity and disconnect positivity from this group or perceived to be of J connection/relation, true or false / made-up "connection." All depending of how it suit the goal of hatred.Telling (talk) 01:29, July 12, 2023 (EDT)

One thing that concerns me is, many people today have the impression that the day after Hitler blew his brains out, the Holocaust was fully perceived and understood. It wasn't. It took decades to get a full picture of what happened, why, and how. Many of that generation that fought the war turned away, weren't interested, and wanted to forget their wartime experiences. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 01:36, July 12, 2023 (EDT)

Yes. And propaganda dehumanizing by Goebbels/Streicher etc., was the foundation.Telling (talk) 01:41, July 12, 2023 (EDT)

FYI

The populist Right are fake revolutionaries. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 20:44, July 24, 2023 (EDT)

Here's another one, with a backgrond on Progressivism: Fake Friends of Russia Society. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 21:58, August 30, 2023 (EDT)

Welcome back

Welcome back! Good to see you. My apologies for any misunderstanding we may have had in the past. My hopes are to improve communication between editors and promote cooperation. Thanks. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 15:09, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

...thanks. Just so you know, I don't intend in the meantime on contributing massive blocks of content, though perhaps eventually. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Tuesday, 15:22, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

Well good. We all appreciate your work value your efforts. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 15:35, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

I see; I just hope that any potential edits of mind to the mainspace in the future don't get blanket-reverted and my follow-up inquiry on the respective talk page getting trolled, as was the case in the dispute at the National Socialism article. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Tuesday, 15:37, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

Not to make excuses, but please understand the position of an Admin. An Admin cannot allow his time to be held hostage by others; if an Admin action results in a reversion, yes a talk page discussion should take place. Only the Admin cannot allow others to control their time. Please be patient. If good faith edits were reverted, my habit would be to paste onto the talk page the wording and ask, "What's wrong with this?" If's it a deserving of a response, you'll surely get one and compromise language can be worked out. Just don't expect a response immediately there and then on the spot.

Sometimes it may even be beneficial to post proposed wording to what can be anticipated as controversial changes on talk first. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 15:46, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

At the end of the day, people are people—leaders are no more inherently righteous nor of automatic better judgment than subordinates, neither as it concerns bosses and workers, parents and children, etc. I know you're a top administrator, though everyone ought to be inherently understanding of others, just as I would be to someone I have an extent of authority over. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Tuesday, 15:56, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

Please join Reasons to be Christian Forum. Thank you

Hi LT. Sent you an Email recently but don't know if you saw it. Anyway, the gist was:

I recently created a Christian Forum for Bible Study and Spiritual Discussion. We can also have Online Fellowship and share Prayer Requests. Please join and invite your friends too! It's completely free to sign up and just takes a few mins. God Bless.

https://reasonstobechristianforum.createaforum.com/index.php NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 16:41, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

Hmm, I see you already have three members on the forum. I may join when there's a wider audience to talk to there. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Tuesday, 16:46, September 5, 2023 (EDT)

Thanks, there are 5 members now. Please join soon, and we'll get momentum going. Many people appreciated the forum, and said it's a Great Idea to have Level 1, Atheism vs Theism, Level 1 Monotheism vs Polytheism, Level 2 Christianity vs Judaism and Islam, etc, but they too are waiting for others to join. I hope many start joining, and I aim for 100 members by the end of the year, then 1000 by next year. Hopefully, we'll have Great Discussions going on soon, and anyone is welcome to sign up and start posting. Also on Persecution and Great Commission. NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 15:47, September 7, 2023 (EDT)

Bidenazis

Boneface has been identified as one of the Orlando Nazis. [20] RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 19:14, September 7, 2023 (EDT)

Anti-Natalism

You didn't give a reason for nominating this article for deletion; maybe you should have used the Speedy tag? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:48, September 10, 2023 (EDT)

Heads up

The powers that be expressed appreciation that a longterm editor had returned after a decade. Your reversion was right, but a 30 day block without warning is too Karajouesque at this time. Thanks for helping.

Who knows, maybe at some point an endorphin generating rage blocking spree might be necessary, but for now we want to encourage participation, not dampen it. Thanks again. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 13:28, September 11, 2023 (EDT)

I requested the "real presence" eucharist related graphic from my friend.

I requested the "real presence" eucharist-related graphic from my friend. It features some of the church fathers who affirmed "real presence" in the Eucharist.

Once he resends it to me, I will share it with you. In the meantime, you can review what I sent you.

Don't ask me a lot of questions about this topic or expect a debate on it. It is new to me. Conservative (talk) 22:19, September 13, 2023 (EDT)

Here is what my friend sent me:

St. Clement of Alexandria on the Eucharist.

The Eucharist is not merely symbolic graphic

I hope this is helpful in terms of your studies on this issue. Conservative (talk) 23:19, September 13, 2023 (EDT)

Interesting. I see even within the past few months, you've continued to excoriate the Catholic Church, and yet... you are now promoting Romanist doctrine. As for whether the quotes by the Apostolic Fathers regarding the bread and wine being the body and blood of Jesus, I don't find enough information on whether those statements were literal or figurative, since most sources in top search results are Catholic websites. Of course, the Eucharist is of pagan origin:

“	In the Roman Catholic mass, the Eucharist or “host” (the round wafer) is a symbol of the sun. It is normally placed during ceremonial masses on a monstrance with a crescent moon, symbolizing the plunging of the sun into the womb of the goddess. Some monstrances bear the letters “SFS,” which represents 666, as S was the sixth letter in the ancient Greek alphabet and F is the sixth letter in our alphabet. The round disc in the crescent moon was a symbol of ancient Babylon, and is found in all the ancient religions. In Catholic cathedrals, these symbols are very prominent, often depicting a round form of mother and child within the crescent moon.	”
—Prof. Walter J. Veith, Sep. 2, 2009

So too are Christmas, Easter, the "veneration" of Mary, prayers for the dead, as well as the mainstream doctrines of immediate judgment, eternal tormentism, and Sunday observance of pagan origin. Prof. Veith put it well: "Catholicism is Mithraism." You know there's a problem in the church when people are assailed for faithfully keeping Passover and Sabbath but not for keeping the pagan/occultist rituals of Sunday worship, Christmas, Easter, and Halloween, in addition to wasting hours of time watching sports (which is rooted in pagan fertility cults) instead of studying biblical prophecy. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Thursday, 00:54, September 14, 2023 (EDT)

Re: the loser™

I reread your post to me in my user mailbox. It cracked me up.

I especially found your the loser™ typography to be humorous. Conservative (talk) 03:32, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Glad you enjoy my mocking style. :) And he's now gone off back into rage mode because I dared block a subversive troll. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Friday, 09:32, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

I did enjoy it. When faced with childish behavior, sometimes the best course of acting is mocking. It is a useful comeuppance to people who get too big for their britches and need a cold splash in their face in order to return to reality. Conservative (talk) 09:49, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

A graphic that I created

I hope you liked it. Conservative (talk) 16:55, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

[comment removed]

Message made to the talk page invader of LT's castle: Try to use critical thinking and falsification in your attempts to understand various fields. Then, perhaps you will make progress in terms of your political understanding instead of plateauing or regressing. Gullibility can be a great barrier to understanding. It is better to "trust, but verify" your sources. Conservative (talk) 18:27, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Nice summary, Conservative. The fulfillment of Daniel's 70-week prophecy and "time, times, and dividing of time" prophecy are undeniable facts of history, vindicating the divine revelation of the Bible's authorship. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Friday, 18:31, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

The sore loser™ is trying to invade the castle of your user talk page. I suggest removing the above template. Conservative (talk) 18:32, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

Oh yeah, fair enough. I'll just straight-up remove his comment. :) —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Friday, 18:35, September 15, 2023 (EDT)

What happened to the Lauren Boebert material you vandalized from two pages?

I can't find it. I am in agreement now, after having read the devastating, horrific details from a qualified source, and not from the for-profit partisan gossip-mongers you posted. Yes indeed, she deserves to be drawn and quartered, and the remnants burnt at the stake.

Your vandalism warrants a temporary block. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 12:24, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

My apologies. I found it now. Your trolling and vandalism warrant a temporary block. God bless. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 12:28, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Sorry I became exasperarated during our call.

I am sorry I became exasperated during our call. I have a lot of work to do and I didn't want to spend time on the issue. Conservative (talk) 22:18, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

No worries; I've patiently dealt with your rage in voice calls before, so I'm relatively understanding nowadays. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:38, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

I didn't have rage. I was just annoyed that you wanted to create extra work for me. Anyways, RobS and you love needless drama and crave attention and this latest "nothingburger" is symptomatic of this. It's best I cut you out of my life because I don't want drama. And I don't want the hassle of getting involved in your drama with RobSmith by getting involved in a block/unblock war with RobSmith over you. Because it is just a matter of time before RobSmith blocks you for a time or permanently.

And let's forget about any other work you requested me to do in the past. Because I don't want to do any extra low-priority or unnecessary work. Conservative (talk) 22:47, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

No rage? Your redundant tirade in that earlier voice call tonight just about reached that level, if you ask me... anyways: I already told you that I won't directly create extra work for you. If you don't want to spend two minutes deleting a few pages, then another administrator or assistant sysop can do that instead. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:49, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

I put a lot of work into Conservapedia and I doubt that Andy will go along with deleting my articles - especially due to someone who engages in talk, talk, talk because he craves drama/attention. I recently created articles - one of which Andy really liked relating to chess (we both like chess). Conservative (talk) 22:57, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Oh, and you creating those articles isn't stirring up drama? Your early attacks on LGM explicitly invoked her gender in a bigoted tirade to provoke her. An aged man like yourself should know better. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:59, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Take your drama and virtue signaling elsewhere. RW and its members are not above criticism. Conservative (talk) 23:01, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

[EC] [EC] Out of all the RationalWiki users, you singled out the non-nasty Mario fan who happens to be a woman to viciously attack by using their gender against them. An attack page brutally exposing and castigating SummaAtheologica, Plutocow, Bongolian, Marquee Moon, or goons of that fold? Nope! 'Nuff said.

"tAke yOuR dRamA elsEwHeRe" You're forgetting whose talk page this is. 😂 —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:05, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Cutting you and RobS out of my life and spending more time with peaceable and productive people is one of the best decisions I ever made. Conservative (talk) 23:03, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Okay. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:05, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

Short note about recent events

My pastor taught on the topic of forgiveness today which was a timely sermon. :)

And of course, it is good not to openly show your annoyance to people if it is appropriate to do so. In other words, it's good to act like a diplomat and/or an administrator. At the same time, there is a place for righteous indignation.

The bottom line is that we had a difference of opinion and I could have been a lot more patient and diplomatic about our difference of opinion. I let my deadline pressure on a project and not wanting to get involved in a wiki dispute get the best of me. There were other ways I could have handled it in retrospect.

So no hard feelings. And as far as me trying to get you unblocked you if you feel you have been blocked unfairly, I would like you to keep that to a minimum given that I am going to fill up my calendar a lot fuller as far as work and my social life (I am expanding my social network and business network post-pandemic and post healing up from an injury). Go to Andy first and if it's a short block, maybe just wait it out. The bottom line is that I would like to avoid a block/unblock war and I might need to get Andy involved. And that would take time.

Best wishes on your future editing and endeavors. Conservative (talk) 14:24, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Andy mostly ignores me at this point on user issues. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 16:22, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Ok. Sorry to hear that. Conservative (talk) 17:41, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Hey, Zerohedge is using your photo

[21] Maybe if you touch up the text somewhat with recent edits, Google will pick it up and you'll pick up some views. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 16:48, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

You were the one who told me to upload the picture, I believe? The standard right-wing narrative of "KKK were Democrats" is pointless anyways, because the left responds with, "KKK were right-wing conservatives." —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 17:00, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

That's the donkey you have to quit riding: "left-right", "Democrat-Republican", etc., at least for the duration of the war. It's exactly what the billionaire globalist oligarch elites want - internal division. It's exactly what they fear - the populace resolving their differences, quit blaming each other for their problems, and realize the oligarchs are in control, and they are the one's making our lives difficult and miserable. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 17:47, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Spoken like a true Gnostic occultist! We must transcend the demiurge of political ideological labels and work upwards by overthrowing those evil materialistic oligarchs to reach the true god and realize that we ourselves our gods destined for utopia as the clandestine initiated class. Because that's what you sound like right now. I've made it clear to you: your effort to make me forsake an analysis of left–right politics is not going to work—you're better off staring at a wall, because your arrogant haughtiness demolishes any hope of convincing me to your silly causes at this point. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 19:03, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Guess what? You're going to meet a leftists in eternity, no matter which way you go. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 19:13, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

If there is any deceptive tool of Satan, I'd rank the Left-right paradigm up there in top 5 or 10. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 19:15, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

The left–right spectrum is only deceptive if not understood properly; I, OTOH, have done sufficient research in the past few years to grasp a basic concept. Oh, and there's going to be leftists going to Heaven? First off, you gave no clarification, and secondly, very cute unsubstantiated claims you continue to pull out of nowhere. The question of course is whether you're referring to leftists only of a specific time period or any "radical liberal" out of all ages. A long time ago, classical liberalism had a radical left-wing populist faction, though adherents to that sect didn't appear to hold a proper view of the Bible even if they were Protestants. At the end of the day, your propaganda apparatus fails to subvert me because I understand too many facts to be that easily deceived by the fruit of the sons of the devil. (John 8:44) —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 19:31, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Oh, ok. When somebody flies a hand grenade through your bedroom window with a $75 drone from Walmart, let me know if they were leftists or rightists. Ok? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 21:59, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

I'm not worried about the possibility of that. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 22:00, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

The technical expertise for a cheap way to kill people anonymously with drones is being perfected with your tax dollars now. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 22:04, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Yeah, as if the U.S. hasn't been speaking like a dragon (Rev. 13:11) for a while now! —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 22:08, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

The problem is, local police departments and homicide investigators don't have the sophisticated electronic defense system to track and record the point of origin of an electronic signal flying a drone, let alone the training, etc. And even if they did have the equipment with constant 24/7 monitoring to track the GPS location where the drone was launched and controlled, they still have trouble proving a suspect was at a certain location and certain specific time. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 22:27, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

Whatever. Imagine being that immersed with the world (1 John 2:15) you forget the core priority. (Matthew 28:19–20) —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 08:16, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:36, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

I don't care. If you were a true prophet, you'd display the works of the Spirit, but seeing your rotten fruits, you are of your father the devil. The reason I can tell you lack the true spirit of prophecy is because of your emphasis on worldliness. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 10:43, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Anyways, I figured you know what page(s) the photo is on. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 17:49, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

I really don't care anymore. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 19:03, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

We need the link

Get the link to the para-nazi stuff in the UK and place it alongside my two updated links on the talk/Essay page. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:56, September 19, 2023 (EDT)

Here's the link about the original story of the woman at first losing the case. However, thank God that horrific ruling was overturned. If you need more, there's the footnotes in my brief Secular Europe and eugenics article. And if all that still isn't enough, let me know and I'll give you more sources, though right now I'm busy expanding the Chinese Communist collaboration with Japanese war criminals article. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Tuesday, 12:11, September 19, 2023 (EDT)

10-4 good buddy. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 12:18, September 19, 2023 (EDT)

I fixed all your Double Redirects for you. tx. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 12:39, September 20, 2023 (EDT)

Thank you; I'll try to remember to fix double redirects next time I make page title moves. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Wednesday, 15:07, September 20, 2023 (EDT)

Theological Debate: Do the Saints in Heaven Pray for us. Yes

Sources here: https://reasonstobechristianforum.createaforum.com/general-discussion/do-the-saints-in-heaven-pray-for-us-2-macc-15-rev-5-etc/msg43/?topicseen#msg43 God Bless. NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 22:24, September 19, 2023 (EDT)

2 Maccabees is an apocryphal book which doesn't belong in the biblical canon. And there are only a handful of people in Heaven right now, because the dead sleep in the grave until the resurrection. I've addressed this topic before. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Wednesday, 23:29, September 19, 2023 (EDT)

NishantXavier, what are the best web articles in favor of the Apocrypa being in the biblical cannon? Conservative (talk) 06:25, September 20, 2023 (EDT)

Oh no, now you're going about delving into the Apocrypha? The Apostle Paul told us not to give heed to Jewish myths! (Titus 1:12–14) —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Wednesday, 09:51, September 20, 2023 (EDT)

Hi Conservative, remembered that you asked me this, so I want to respond. I would start here: "For instance, the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, states:[7]

"A council probably held at Rome in 382 under St. Damasus gave a complete list of the canonical books of both the Old Testament and the New Testament (also known as the 'Gelasian Decree' because it was reproduced by Gelasius in 495), which is identical with the list given at Trent." ... And Catholic Answers, which claims to be “the world’s largest source of explanations for Catholic beliefs and practices”, says:[10]

It was the Catholic Church who determined the canon—or list of books—of the Bible under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. ... The process culminated in 382 as the Council of Rome, which was convened under the leadership of Pope Damasus, promulgated the 73-book scriptural canon." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelasian_Decree NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 08:44, September 21, 2023 (EDT)

Shortened. See also this, on the 4th Century Council of Carthage. 2 Maccabees, as well as Judith, Tobith etc, were in the Christian Canon for over a 1000 years before Luther. As Luther also criticized James and Revelation, beside others, it shows the absolute ecclesiastical anarchy to which denying the Bible Canon will result - if you can remove 5 or 10 books from the universally accepted Bible Canon in Christendom for over a 1000 years, why can't I remove 1 or 2 more? No, the Canon was fixed for all time in the 4th Century, and it always included Maccabees: "two books of the Maccabees." https://www.bible-researcher.com/carthage.html NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 08:47, September 21, 2023 (EDT)

No verse in the New Testament ever quotes the Apocrypha. 'Nuff said! —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Thursday, 11:50, September 21, 2023 (EDT)

Cooperative Editors

All it is a pledge to treat others with deferential respect, and not get into stupid trolling disputes like some people we know. Any questions? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 01:17, September 22, 2023 (EDT)

Thank you for the talk page comment on the article "internet atheism" as an admin should not severely vandalize popular articles with 87,000 page views

I just made Andy aware that RobSmith just severely vandalized my Internet atheism article which has 87,000 page views and ranks #3 for the term internet atheism. He took about 47,000 bytes out of it.

Admins should not engage in vandalism since they are here to prevent vandalism.

Thank you for the talk page comment on the article "internet atheism" as an admin should not severely vandalize popular articles. Conservative (talk) 20:35, September 23, 2023 (EDT)

Yep, no problem. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 21:34, September 23, 2023 (EDT)

I've got the power! (Does a couple of slick dance moves)

'RobSmith wrote:' He gave McCarthy and the GOP every excuse to vote for massive defense spending that will have an inflationary effect. Even moreso with de-dollarization. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 22:11, September 23, 2023 (EDT)"

LT wrote: "McCarthy before resolving his dilemma on whether to support continued Ukraine funding: "whew, this User:Conservative guy has some brilliant essays that will 100% influence by decision, and so because of his revelations I'm going to betray MTG after all!" Do you actually believe that? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 22:16, September 23, 2023 (EDT)"

LT, I've got the power! (Does a couple of slick dance moves).

By the way, I plainly say I am against the U.S. funding of the war in Ukraine (See: Essay: How long will the war in Ukraine last and what will its likely outcomes will be? A prediction on its outcomes). Conservative (talk) 22:56, September 23, 2023 (EDT)

Yep, I thought I remember you stating that you oppose Ukraine war funding. RobSmith's Ph.D. in quote-mining really shows sometimes, eh? And I'm glad you liked my humorous response to him. :) —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:06, September 23, 2023 (EDT)

I have been cited/quoted/referred to by USA Today, The Chicago Tribune, The Tampa Tribune, a theological scholar, Concerned Women for America, CRU, Penn Jillette, PZ Myers, Kyle Kulinski, Lewis Black and a leading French news outlet.

Kevin McCarthy keeps trying to call me about whether the USA should fund the war in Ukraine, but I blocked his number! Conservative (talk) 23:21, September 23, 2023 (EDT)

🤣 —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 23:23, September 23, 2023 (EDT)

Ah yes, Lewis Black, reminds me of growing up in Wisconsin. Everything he says is true. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 02:25, September 24, 2023 (EDT)

I'd be interested in hearing where Lewis Black credited User:Conservative's work? Was it in the Homosexuality series?, cause obviously Black is a rampant homophobe. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 16:21, September 24, 2023 (EDT)

A request

This is User: Conservative. Andy is going to contact User: RobSmith about the following matter this week and hopefully RobSmith decides to change his behavior. But if he doesn't, please contact User: Aschlafly about this matter should RobSmith persists.

Below is a post I recently made to User: Aschlafly.

The attacks by a Conservapedia Admin on a current Admin needs to stop completely and if he persists there need to be consequences

One thing I want to add about the current situation of User: RobSmith currently attacking User: Conservative.

RobSmith has been relentlessly attacking me via talk pages (and other pages of Conservapedia) and provoking me to respond to him. While this morning I  made the decision to totally ignore him henceforth, this is unwarranted. I have brought a lot of traffic and publicity to Conservapedia. And currently, I do work for conservative organizations and assist a leading podcast in a beneficial way by inviting some conservatives.  I realize that RobSmith may have all the time in the world to waste vindictively attacking me, but this is very foolish and it needs to stop. 

I updated my bio for Conservapedia and it reflects the work I currently do. And none of it involves the slanderous and false gossip that RobSmith is trying to push such as me allegedly being a bisexual, being a partner in 3-way love affair, attending a church whose pastor is married to a drag queen or being an unethical salesman (I don't even currently work in sales).  

The problem with gossip is that it not only disgraces the tall tale bearer, but it also brings shame to Conservapedia. Recently, a fellow Conservapedian said that fellow conservatives seeing RobSmith's shameful behavior harms Conservapedia's reputation among fellow conservatives.

And the icing on the cake is that User: RobSmith set up Conservapedia:Team CP to supposedly help promote cordiality at Conservapedia. Unsurprisingly, only one Conservapedian joined. And ironically, the one Conservapedian who did join, recently criticized User: RobSmith for his incivility. I believe that RobSmith set up Team CP to make himself look good and to serve as a distraction from his obviously uncivil behavior. Well, it's not working as 5 Conservapedians have commented to me about User: RobSmith's bad behavior.

And if this wasn't bad enough, recently the Admin RobSmith vindictively vandalized the popular article Internet atheism which has over 87,000 page views created by User: Conservative and removed over 50,000 bytes of content from the article. An Admin is supposed to stop vandalism at Conservapedia - not create it!

Here is my update to my bio on Conservapedia's page on Conservapedia just to make things perfectly clear:

The User:Conservative account has contributed the majority of content to the extremely popular Atheism, evolution, and homosexuality articles. User: Conservative's work has been cited/quoted/referred to by the Los Angeles Times, USA Today, The Chicago Tribune, The Telegraph, The Tampa Tribune, Concerned Women for America, CRU, WorldNetDaily, Shockofgod, Penn Jillette, PZ Myers, Kyle Kulinski, Lewis Black, and a leading French news outlet. The PNN News and Ministry Network produced a video entitled Viral article deals major blow to atheism. The book Atheist Persona: Causes and Consequences by John J. Pasquini, Th.D, cites Conservapedia's Causes of atheism article several times. [22] Currently, User: Conservative is a Producer for a politics/social commentary/investigative reporting podcast that is among the top 1/2 percent of podcast in popularity and he has obtained interviews from best-selling authors, academics, filmmakers, political activists and religious figures. He also provides and/or has provided digital marketing services for a company, some leading nonprofits and a church in addition to being a writer who writes content for popular articles on the internet.

I trust this information helps clarify matters. And by the way, Andy knows these things are true just in case the gossiper RobSmith should wish to contend my bio. Conservative (talk) 08:09, September 24, 2023 (EDT)

Yes, I know. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 11:48, September 24, 2023 (EDT)

"An Admin is supposed to stop vandalism at Conservapedia - not create it!"

Page Protect is for stopping vandalism - not insulating yourself from discussion. User:Conservative has done nothing to use Page Protect to stop vandalism at Conservapedia for 16 years. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 13:10, September 24, 2023 (EDT)

Conservapedia is not a mobocracy. Spamming personal attacks across Conservapedia against another editor to organize a mob is violation of multiple CP Guidelines. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 13:14, September 24, 2023 (EDT)