User talk:Liberaltears

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, Liberaltears, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Liberaltears!

Getting in contact with the editor of the User:Liberaltears account

If you want to get in contact with User:Liberaltears, you can do so here: MESSAGE AREA. The message area may be checked infrequently. If you want to provide feedback concerning content this account has created at Conservapedia, please use the talk pages of the respective articles.

If you wish to provide feedback to the editor who uses this account concerning any previous edits that have been made using this account, please use the talk pages of Conservapedia articles.


First, you don't ever speak for me, nor do you apologize for me. Second, you don't reverse my blocks because it makes you feel good. Apparently, you ignored this individual's own history in this site, in Wikipedia, and in other sites where he decided on his own accord to try to force his own personal viewpoint on various subjects, which included the identification and calling out of an edit war by you in the Santa Claus article. His own viewpoint on Conservapedia as a whole is in this page[1], where he condemns us for believing God created the earth in a week. No, we do not this this guy back at all; he can take his viewpoint somewhere else. Karajou (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2021 (EDT)

It's not a big deal. The search engines like original content. If he were to write original content at Conservapedia and then give it some time and then later copy it to Wikipedia that would be better. This way, Conservapedia would get the credit for it to be original content. Conservapedia states in its commandments or guidelines that we don't want people copying content at Wikipedia and posting it at Conservapedia.Conservative (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
In other words, we are better off without that editor if he was going to do nothing but copy his Wikpedia content to Conservapedia.Conservative (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
That type of lousy attitude is why our Alexa ranking has fallen so much. Furthermore, editors here are allowed to bring over content they write on WP. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Saturday, 16:34, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
The lousy attitude is yours. He was blocked for edit wars, and you have the nerve to change it to my own attitude, and a disallowing by me for his WP articles? You need to change your way of thinking. Karajou (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
All I was saying is that it could have been worse. It doesn't appear to be a tragedy.Conservative (talk) 16:41, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
Well Karajou, speaking of me needing to change my mind, at least now you're maybe half recognizing that the role of an admin is to convince and persuade others than to outright use the banhammer. I'll hand that to you. Thank you for changing your way of thinking! —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 15:35, 4 April 2021 (EDT)