Mystery: Was John a Samaritan

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 03:53, December 25, 2023. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search
See also: Mystery:Unsolved_Gospel_Mysteries

John the Apostle was most likely a Samaritan, in light of:

  • John's unique description of Jesus as possibly coming from the Samaritans;
  • John's sympathy towards Samaritans, including describing how Jesus first disclosed his divinity to a Samaritan woman at a well (which everyone else omitted);
  • John's repeated references -- 10 times more than any other Gospel -- to "the Jews," meaning the Jewish people in and around Jerusalem, was how Samaritans would have referred to their rivals;
  • only the Gospel of John contains a derogatory reference, as Samaritans would have felt, about the Jewish region of Nazareth: “Nathanael said to him, 'Can anything good come out of Nazareth?' Philip said to him, 'Come and see.'” John 1:46
  • the Gospel of John emphasized the concept of the sacrificial lamb, which is a central part of Passover for Samaritans but not for Masoretic Jews.[1]
  • the Gospel of John contains only 27 quotations and allusions to books of the Old Testament, far less than "Matthew (124), Mark (70), and Luke (109),"[2] and the Samaritans recognized only the Pentateuch in the Old Testament;
  • among the few references by the Gospel of John to the Old Testament, many are Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John which may have been added later;
  • the universality of the Gospel of John, as in John 3:16 ;
  • his harsh language against Jewish leaders, whom Samaritans already disliked;
  • the thriving "Johannine community" in the late 1st and 2nd century A.D. had ideological similiarities to Samaritan views, and probably included many Samaritans;
  • the mysterious disappearance of most Samaritans, who perhaps converted to Christianity on the strength of John's teachings to them;
  • John had a rivalry with Peter, suggesting they may have had different ethnicities;
  • the lack of parables in the Gospel of John, which was a teaching style used 11 times in Old Testament books not recognized by Samaritans and by Jewish rabbis who opposed Samaritans;
  • the Gospel of John has more references to "life" than all the other Gospels combined, and the Samaritan version of the Book of Exodus is more pro-life than the Jewish Masoretic translation;[3] and
  • the name "John" is Aramaic rather than Hebrew.[4]

References