User:Conservative/technology
< User:Conservative
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conservative (talk | contribs) at 03:44, January 29, 2025. It may differ significantly from current revision.
YouTube
Innovation
Innovation articles:
Artificial intelligence
- What Is Deepseek and How Is It Different From ChatGPT? - ChatGPT offers limited customization options but provides a polished, user-friendly experience suitable for a broad audience. DeepSeek responds faster in technical and niche tasks, while ChatGPT provides better accuracy in handling complex and nuanced queries.
- DeepSeek vs ChatGPT - how do they compare? -Brainstorming: ChatGPT responded in seconds with six neatly summarised ideas. DeepSeek, on the other hand, responded with just one idea - "Luna and the Boy Who Chased the Stars". It struck me that while ChatGPT gave me ideas, DeepSeek wrote a full story. It wasn't particularly good.
- DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: I tried the hot new AI model. It was impressive, but there were some things it wouldn't talk about., Business Insider, 2025. Plenty of caveats. For one, DeepSeek is subject to strict censorship on contentious issues in China.
Changing face of workplace
Droids:
Robotics:
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part I
- Mish Shedrock on Robotics - Part II
- Humans Need Not Apply
- Rising Robots: Is it Obvious Robots Cost Human Jobs? Looking for Someone to Blame
Robots and economic process of creative destruction:
Robots and repetitive jobs:
Problems with modern scientific community
- Modern science is non-science
- Quackery Crisis! Less than 1 percent of Scientific Journals Utilize Scientific Method
Scientific community and science publications
Social science literature has major problems
Environmental science
Military technology
SR-71 Blackbird:
- SR-71 Blackbird was so fast it outran every missile, Mig fighter jet encountered over enemy territory
- Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Fastest Jet in the World
Apache helicopters and helicopter gunships:
Creation vs. evolution
"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[1]