User talk:CPalmer

Archive: 2008

Award

I am declaring you an honourary WikiGnome for all your efforts in doing the fiddly things no-one else seems to do. --KotomiT^{ohayougozaimasu} 12:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks! And congratulations to you on your well-deserved promotion - Conservapedia will benefit enormously from your extra powers.--CPalmer 13:23, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Thank you! Please yell if there is some way I can put these mysterious new powers to use helping you out. --KotomiT^{ohayougozaimasu} 13:28, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Great addition

That's a great addition to Essay:Best New Conservative Words!!!--Andy Schlafly 10:11, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks - I've been trying to think of a word that would be suitable, but not come up with anything good so far. I'll add it if I do...--CPalmer 10:24, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Liberal deceit

That's isn't a category, but a re-direct to deceit. The category for it, and the like is "Liberalism" which is added by the template "liberalism". --₮K_/Admin^/Talk 15:47, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Seems logical. Thanks--CPalmer 07:57, 13 January 2009 (EST)

query.

Just on your query "is there a way to list articles where the reflist is missing?" I am not 100% sure what you mean, but can I help? --KotomiT^nandeyanen? 09:36, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Just that in articles that have a <ref> tag but not a <references/> tag, you get a big red error message at the bottom of the page. I've come across a few of these by chance, but I was wondering whether there was a more systematic way to find and fix them (I also queried it at User Talk:EdBot).--CPalmer 09:41, 19 January 2009 (EST)

See the bottom of Talk:Barack Obama for an example of what I mean.--CPalmer 09:42, 19 January 2009 (EST)

(NMHOB) I misread you and fixed that one, then re-read and realised what you meant.... sorry. MikeSalter 09:45, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Ah, I see what you mean. To be honest I have no idea if there is an "easy" way to find them (like when I had to find all the unprotected pictures). Edbot might be your best bet. Sorry I can not help. :( --KotomiT^nandeyanen? 09:48, 19 January 2009 (EST)

No problem Mike. For the benefit of anyone else reading this, I'm going to make an example at User:CPalmer/Missingrefs.--CPalmer 09:49, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Found a list! This Google search brings up several pages of them. Perhaps someone with some spare time might offer their services?--CPalmer 09:56, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Well done! Please copy the link on my talk page. I will help out with them when I get back home from the dojo. --KotomiT^nandeyanen? 10:04, 19 January 2009 (EST)

I have had a look at a few of those on the Google list and it seems as if it is a bigger problem. Most of those seem to be named reference tags, with no original reference linked to them. Tricky. --KotomiT^nandeyanen? 13:29, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks for the heads-up

I'll redo that liberal ideology edit then. Underscoreb 21:41, 3 February 2009 (EST)

You're welcome, Unders.--CPalmer 08:30, 4 February 2009 (EST)

Pokemon deletions

Having a bit of fun with it, are you (i.e. deleticus, I choose you!)? Good stuff. :) WesleyS^Hello! 14:20, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Yes, small things and small minds I know, but it livens up the recent change list.--CPalmer 14:21, 9 February 2009 (EST)

This is true. Delete, delete, delete is too plain. Imagine how dull it was to read cat, cat, cat, recat, cat the cat, etc a few months ago between the two of us. WesleyS^Hello! 14:24, 9 February 2009 (EST)