Talk:Documentary Hypothesis

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RJJensen (talk | contribs) at 19:53, June 3, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

conservative view

Conservative Biblical scholars such as Kenneth Kitchen and Gleason Archer and others give various arguments on why the Documentary Hypothesis is not supported by any evidence and also ignores evidence that Moses wrote the Torah. [1][2][3][4][5] [6] In addition, Dr. Yohanan Aharoni argues that archaeological discoveries shows that later authors or editors could not have put together or invented the Torah stories hundreds of years after they happened. [7] Christian apologist Josh McDowell in his work New Evidence that Demands a Verdict discusses the development of the Documentary Hypothesis and its presuppositions, discusses various components of the Documentary hypothesis why scholars believe they are invalid, and lastly cites evidence that scholars believe argue for the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch. [8]

Sources

We need some better sourcing for this article, and less dogma. Where did it come from? RJJensen 15:52, 3 June 2009 (EDT)

references

  1. ↑ http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/moses.html
  2. ↑ http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/apologetics/AP0404W3.htm
  3. ↑ http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/13
  4. ↑ http://www.christian-thinktank.com/aec2.html
  5. ↑ http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/moses.htm
  6. ↑ http://answering-islam.org.uk/Campbell/s3c1.html
  7. ↑ http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/bible_criticism.htm
  8. ↑ http://www.geocities.com/k9ocu/DH.htm
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Documentary_Hypothesis&oldid=670043"