Difference between revisions of "Atheism and emptiness"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
[[Ravi Zacharias]] International Ministries (RZIM) indicates: "Ravi Zacharias defines the four main questions of life: origin, meaning, [[morality]] and destiny and the answers to these questions can determine if a [[worldview]] is coherent.<ref>[https://www.rzim.org/listen/just-a-thought/a-coherent-worldview A Coherent Worldview] by [[Ravi Zacharias]] International Ministries website</ref> See also: [[Atheism and incoherency]]
 
[[Ravi Zacharias]] International Ministries (RZIM) indicates: "Ravi Zacharias defines the four main questions of life: origin, meaning, [[morality]] and destiny and the answers to these questions can determine if a [[worldview]] is coherent.<ref>[https://www.rzim.org/listen/just-a-thought/a-coherent-worldview A Coherent Worldview] by [[Ravi Zacharias]] International Ministries website</ref> See also: [[Atheism and incoherency]]
 +
 +
The article The Emptiness of Atheism stated:
 +
{{Cquote|Imagine a world with no objective values. In this world, people who get away with horrific crimes such as child abuse, rape, and murder never find justice. It is a world in which there is no meaning over and above individual or societal whims. In this world, people seek their own pleasure without boundaries. If sex between men and men, between women and women, or between people and animals satisfies someone, there is no law in this world that could condemn it other than someone’s individual moral whims. And if something inconvenient gets in the way of one’s pleasure, such as a pregnancy, in this world a woman can find a “doctor” to murder her baby under the full protection of the law.<ref>[https://gratiaetnatura.wordpress.com/2010/12/21/the-emptiness-of-atheism/ The Emptiness of Atheism]</ref>}}
 +
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
  

Revision as of 00:59, September 12, 2019

The Atheist Revolution website indicated about the emptiness of atheism:

There is a certain emptiness in atheism in the sense that it provides no answers to many of life's most important questions. For example, atheism tells us nothing about how one should live one's life. On this point, I can find agreement with some of the Atheism+ supporters in that I can see why people would say, "Great, we're atheists. Now what?" I certainly understand the appeal of wanting to go "beyond atheism."[1]

Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM) indicates: "Ravi Zacharias defines the four main questions of life: origin, meaning, morality and destiny and the answers to these questions can determine if a worldview is coherent.[2] See also: Atheism and incoherency

The article The Emptiness of Atheism stated:

Imagine a world with no objective values. In this world, people who get away with horrific crimes such as child abuse, rape, and murder never find justice. It is a world in which there is no meaning over and above individual or societal whims. In this world, people seek their own pleasure without boundaries. If sex between men and men, between women and women, or between people and animals satisfies someone, there is no law in this world that could condemn it other than someone’s individual moral whims. And if something inconvenient gets in the way of one’s pleasure, such as a pregnancy, in this world a woman can find a “doctor” to murder her baby under the full protection of the law.[3]

See also

References

  1. The Emptiness of Atheism, Atheist Revolution website
  2. A Coherent Worldview by Ravi Zacharias International Ministries website
  3. The Emptiness of Atheism