Last modified on February 22, 2009, at 06:42

Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse"

(Deletion of article by Conservative)
(Abuse Complaints)
 
(308 intermediate revisions by 73 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<noinclude><center>[[Conservapedia:Desk|Back to the Desk]]</center><br></noinclude>
 
<noinclude><center>[[Conservapedia:Desk|Back to the Desk]]</center><br></noinclude>
<big><font color="blue">Abuse Complaints</font></big><br>
+
=<font color="blue">Abuse Complaints</font>=
<sup>Archives:[[Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse/Archive1|1]]</sup>
+
Archives: [[Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse/Archive1|1]] [[Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse/Archive2|2]] [[Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse/Archive3|3]]<br>
 +
Conservapedia no longer handles complaints of abuse on the wiki. This allows us to handle such matters carefully and professionally, and allows all parties to retain their dignity. Previous discussions here tended to be ignored by one side while the other side would spin popular opinion. Such is not efficient, effective, or businesslike.
  
== Abuse by sysop Fox ==
+
Before filing any complaints, please take about five minutes to assess the situation from an outside view. Carefully notice any errors you made and try to see things from the other side's point of view as well. If you still think there might be a problem, rationally attempt to contact the other party by email. Do not rant or send hate mail, as that will not help your case. Many people have the innate capacity to be calm and rational if approached as such. If this route is unsuccessful, please contact an active senior sysop and we will work from there. Please note that we will treat anything told to us as a personnel matter and will hold it in the strictest confidence. Many resolutions may not appear publicly but the matter will be resolved. Thank you and have a wonderful day.
I was permanently blocked under username TraJSmith by Fox apparently for being a liberal parodist.
+
I have written no parodies on this site.  I either contribute short, but stragiht forward factual issues, usually on matters financial, or offer opinions on discussion pages.  My opinions are liberal, however.
+
What parody was written?
+
Should a sysop be given power to permanently delete a user for anything less than an egregious crime?
+
:Comment by Fox:You're absolutely right - I believe there was a mistake, and I was actually blocking you for trolling in the Main page:Talk; (although that is often the place to find many liberal parodists posing as outraged conservatives.) [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 14:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
== not sure if this is where i bring this to attention... ==
+
 
+
A sysop might want to block [[User:RWest]] for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ann_Coulter/1&diff=prev&oldid=248430 this] edit. [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 16:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
*For a talk page comment?  Hardly.  More likely a sysop would block someone for a globalist POV, such as suggesting articles be renamed in compliance with WP's world view. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 05:17, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
== David Landreth article ==
+
 
+
the article is extremely vain and i think the writer should be warned {{unsigned|Marowit}}
+
:The main author has not edited here since the end of May, so appears to no longer be around.  Perhaps you could simply improve [[David Landreth|the article]] yourself?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
== Deletion of article by Conservative ==
+
 
+
I wrote an article called "Abortion Attitudes" that was immediately deleted by Conservative. The article simply stated the results of polls about Americans attitudes about abortion.  He or she claimed that it "wasn't nuanced enought" or some such nonsense.
+
 
+
He could have edited it to make it more nuanced.  
+
 
+
Please respond.
+
::See my message to you at: [[User talk:Wismike]].  I don't think you made a very good attempt at creating a good article and I think it was intentional. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:07, 3 August 2007 (EDT)‎
+

Latest revision as of 06:42, February 22, 2009

Back to the Desk

Abuse Complaints

Archives: 1 2 3
Conservapedia no longer handles complaints of abuse on the wiki. This allows us to handle such matters carefully and professionally, and allows all parties to retain their dignity. Previous discussions here tended to be ignored by one side while the other side would spin popular opinion. Such is not efficient, effective, or businesslike.

Before filing any complaints, please take about five minutes to assess the situation from an outside view. Carefully notice any errors you made and try to see things from the other side's point of view as well. If you still think there might be a problem, rationally attempt to contact the other party by email. Do not rant or send hate mail, as that will not help your case. Many people have the innate capacity to be calm and rational if approached as such. If this route is unsuccessful, please contact an active senior sysop and we will work from there. Please note that we will treat anything told to us as a personnel matter and will hold it in the strictest confidence. Many resolutions may not appear publicly but the matter will be resolved. Thank you and have a wonderful day.