Page history
February 22, 2009
→Abuse Complaints
+4
→Abuse Complaints: fixing words
+1,128
Protected "Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse": Trying a better method [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
m
January 11, 2009
December 19, 2008
→TK: * is copy right of mine! :p
+2,779
→TK: baby with the bath water?
+707
→TK: "Shame on you"???
+1,742
December 17, 2008
December 16, 2008
→Unwarranted 90/10 block
m+14
→Unwarranted 90/10 block
+1,372
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: There we go. I think that should be all. You can block me for pointing out how blocks are used on all those who point out that blocks are used to...
m+14
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: Gotta work fast before the Hammer hits me, too!
m+13
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: Oh, wait, BRichtigen was ALSO blocked! WAY TO HANDLE THE ABUSE HELPDESK, TK!
+351
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: I guess I'll join Corry on the Block Bench in a few for posting this.
+1,061
→Unwarranted 90/10 block
+248
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: Gods speed to you!
+1,045
sp
m+1
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: Nice quote.....
+232
→Unwarranted 90/10 block
+943
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: could be; who's perfect?
+189
→Unwarranted 90/10 block: (scribbling on a fig leaf)
+537
December 14, 2008
December 5, 2008
→Range Blocks: Remove inappropriate remark.
-50
Reinstate section improperly removed; it's about abuse, not the importance of the article.
+6,742
→Range Blocks
+229
December 4, 2008
→Range Blocks
+574
→Interference and Collusiveness
+552
→Range Blocks: Not a public matter
+218
→Interference and Collusiveness: Knock it off
+344
→Axiom of Choice: 2nd of all, this is not an important article.
-6,619
First of all, don't make it personal - that is itself a type of abuse
-12
→Abuse Complaints
+40
→Abuse Complaints
-103,225
Interference and Collusiveness
+2,155
→Range Blocks: short reply
+609
December 3, 2008
December 2, 2008
→Range Blocks: Not a forum for whingeing.
+432
→Range Blocks
+653
→Range Blocks: reply
+101
Undo revision 575675
-731
→Range Blocks
+731
→Range Blocks
+1,457
→Range Blocks: Some numbercrunching and a quick overview about security trade-offs
+1,610
→Range Blocks: re: site security
+358
no edit summary
+162
→Range Blocks: Sorry, not up for discussion.
+747
Thanks!
+73
reply about ranges
+201