Difference between revisions of "Essay: The transitional animal the flying pig?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Essay: The transitional animal the flying pig" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
(→‎Are the transitional species flying pigs related to flying kitties and flying dogs?)
 
(40 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
  
−
Please notice the large wing span which [[evolution|evolved]] over time in order to keep the flying pig aloft. Evolutionary scientists are not exactly sure what flying pig looked like and the above picture is believed to be a close facsimile.  
+
Please notice the large wing span which according to evolutionary scientists is said to have [[evolution|evolved]] over time in order to keep the flying pig aloft. [[Evolution|Evolutionary "scientists"]] are not exactly sure what the flying pig looked like and the above animated picture is believed by evolutionists to be a close facsimile.  
  
−
== This pig lived! No imaginary evolutionist fancy involved.  Really! ==
+
== Do flying pigs really exist? Any evolutionist imagination involved? ==
  
−
Concerning pictures of the supposed ancestors of man featured in science journals and the news media Boyce Rensberger wrote in the journal ''Science'':
+
Concerning pictures of the supposed ancestors of man featured in science journals and the news media, Boyce Rensberger wrote in the journal ''Science'':
 
{{cquote|Unfortunately, the vast majority of artist's conceptions are based more on imagination than on evidence. But a handful of expert natural-history artists begin with the fossil bones of a hominid and work from there…. Much of the reconstruction, however, is guesswork. Bones say nothing about the fleshy parts of the nose, lips, or ears. Artists must create something between an ape and a human being; the older the specimen is said to be, the more apelike they make it.... Hairiness is a matter of pure conjecture.<ref>Frank Sherwin, M.A., [http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=823 "Human Evolution" An Update]</ref><ref>Bert Thompson, P.H.D. and Brad Harrub, P.H.D., [http://www.apologeticspress.org/pdfs/dc-02-safull.pdf 15 Answers to John Rennie and ''Scientific American's'' Nonsense]</ref>}}
 
{{cquote|Unfortunately, the vast majority of artist's conceptions are based more on imagination than on evidence. But a handful of expert natural-history artists begin with the fossil bones of a hominid and work from there…. Much of the reconstruction, however, is guesswork. Bones say nothing about the fleshy parts of the nose, lips, or ears. Artists must create something between an ape and a human being; the older the specimen is said to be, the more apelike they make it.... Hairiness is a matter of pure conjecture.<ref>Frank Sherwin, M.A., [http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=823 "Human Evolution" An Update]</ref><ref>Bert Thompson, P.H.D. and Brad Harrub, P.H.D., [http://www.apologeticspress.org/pdfs/dc-02-safull.pdf 15 Answers to John Rennie and ''Scientific American's'' Nonsense]</ref>}}
 +
 +
== Are the transitional species flying pigs related to flying kitties ==
 +
Flying pigs are believed by evolutionary "scientists" to be closely related to the [[Essay: The transitional animal the flying kitty?|flying kitties]]. For details on how evolutionary "scientists" arrive at their findings please see: [[Essay: You obviously don't understand how science works|You obviously don't understand how science works...]]
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian]]
 +
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence for Christianity]]
 +
*[[Essay: The transitional animal the flying kitty?|The transitional animal flying kitty?]]
 +
*[[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]
 +
*[[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates|Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]]
 +
*[[Comedy and satires concerning atheism and evolution]] (large collection of comedy/satire concerning [[atheism]] and [[evolution]])
 +
*[[Poe's law]]
 +
*[[Satires of evolution]]
 +
*[[Evolution]]
 +
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
 +
 +
[[Category: Evolution]]
 +
[[Category: Humor]]
 +
[[Category: Satire]]
 +
[[Category: Essays]]

Latest revision as of 10:20, January 4, 2012

Flying pig.gif


Please notice the large wing span which according to evolutionary scientists is said to have evolved over time in order to keep the flying pig aloft. Evolutionary "scientists" are not exactly sure what the flying pig looked like and the above animated picture is believed by evolutionists to be a close facsimile.

Do flying pigs really exist? Any evolutionist imagination involved?

Concerning pictures of the supposed ancestors of man featured in science journals and the news media, Boyce Rensberger wrote in the journal Science:

“ Unfortunately, the vast majority of artist's conceptions are based more on imagination than on evidence. But a handful of expert natural-history artists begin with the fossil bones of a hominid and work from there…. Much of the reconstruction, however, is guesswork. Bones say nothing about the fleshy parts of the nose, lips, or ears. Artists must create something between an ape and a human being; the older the specimen is said to be, the more apelike they make it.... Hairiness is a matter of pure conjecture.[1][2] ”

Are the transitional species flying pigs related to flying kitties

Flying pigs are believed by evolutionary "scientists" to be closely related to the flying kitties. For details on how evolutionary "scientists" arrive at their findings please see: You obviously don't understand how science works...

See also

References

  1. ↑ Frank Sherwin, M.A., "Human Evolution" An Update
  2. ↑ Bert Thompson, P.H.D. and Brad Harrub, P.H.D., 15 Answers to John Rennie and Scientific American's Nonsense
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_The_transitional_animal_the_flying_pig%3F&oldid=951211"