Difference between revisions of "Middle-income trap"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
(China may escape the middle-income trap)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
=== China may escape the middle-income trap ===
 
=== China may escape the middle-income trap ===
  
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVzPV8uDE8s How China Plans To Avoid The Middle Income Trap]
 
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOLceWgfbJ4 Can China Escape the Middle Income Trap?], Dr. Nicholas R. Lardy, Anthony M. Solomon Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics
 
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOLceWgfbJ4 Can China Escape the Middle Income Trap?], Dr. Nicholas R. Lardy, Anthony M. Solomon Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics
  

Revision as of 09:39, April 13, 2024

The middle-income trap refers to an economic theory where a middle-income country is failing to transform itself to a high-income economy due to its rising costs and declining competitiveness (Historically few countries successfully manage the transition from low to middle to high income).[1][2][3][4]

The Asia Society describes the middle-income trap thusly: "The “middle-income trap” is a theory of economic development in which wages in a country rise to the point that growth potential in export-driven low-skill manufacturing is exhausted before it attains the innovative capability needed to boost productivity and compete with developed countries in higher value-chain industries. Thus, there are few avenues for further growth — and wages stagnate."[5]

Slowing growth in emerging markets during the post 2007/2008 financial crisis period provided a new impetus to the “middle-income trap” debate.[6]

Asian Development Bank: The middle-income countries transition to high-income counties around the globe: Characteristics of graduation and slowdown

The abstract for the Asian Development Bank 2015 paper entitled The Middle-Income Transition around the Globe: Characteristics of Graduation and Slowdown indicates:

The paper investigates the situation of middle-income economies around the world. Since 1965, only 18 economies with a population of more than 3 million and not dependent on oil exports have made the transition to being high income. Many more have not been able to move beyond the middle-income stage. We conduct statistical tests of differences between two groups of economies across a range of growth and development variables. The results suggest that middle-income economies are particularly weak in the following areas: governance, infrastructure, savings and investment, inequality, and quality—but not quantity—of education. The findings are used to suggest whether the People’s Republic of China is successfully progressing through the middle-income stage or whether it may get caught in a middle-income trap.[7]

Criticisms of the middle-income trap theory

Material related to whether or not China escapes the middle-income trap

China may escape the middle-income trap

Arguments that China will not escape the middle-income trap

External links

Videos:

References

  1. Middle-Income Trap
  2. China May Be Running Out of Time To Escape the Middle-Income Trap, Asia Society, 2017
  3. Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What is It, Who is in It, and Why? (Part 1), Asia Development Bank, 2012
  4. Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What is It, Who is in It, and Why? (Part 2), Asia Development Bank, 2012
  5. China May Be Running Out of Time To Escape the Middle-Income Trap, Asia Society, 2017
  6. Is economic growth in middle-income countries different from low-income countries? by Barry Eichengreen, Donghyun Park, and Kwanho Shin, Brookings Institute, September 25, 2017
  7. The Middle-Income Transition around the Globe: Characteristics of Graduation and Slowdown by Paul Vandenberg, Lilibeth Poot, and Jeffrey Miyamoto. Asian Development Bank. ADBI Working Paper Series. No. 519. March 2015
  8. Re-examining the Middle-Income Trap Hypothesis (MITH): What to Reject and What to Revive?, Xuehui Han and Shang-Jin Wei, WORKING PAPER 23126 DOI 10.3386/w23126, ISSUE DATE February 2017