Difference between revisions of "Talk:LGBTQI"

Revision as of 02:25, June 18, 2017

LGBTQI should not, in fact, be a redirect to homosexuality. TQI+ are there for a reason. Vive Liberté! 20:11, 16 June 2017 (EDT)

Ideally, there would be a page here eventually. However, I figured with LGBT and LGBTQ already redirecting to Homosexuality, it was better to add this to the redirect list than leave it as a dead end. --David B ^(TALK) 20:42, 16 June 2017 (EDT)

Fair point. Vive Liberté! 20:44, 16 June 2017 (EDT)

My article Gay Christian Movement Watch has received over 60,450 page views. But the external link section was wrong as the website moved to being on a Wordpress subdomain.

I never noticed this matter because I rarely think of homosexuality. Generally, I only think about of the topic of homosexuality when the media mentions the subject.

One of the reasons I rarely think of the subject of homosexuality is the inoculation I received against homosexuality from the John Wayne movies I watched. :) "Fighting soldiers from the sky. Fearless men who jump and die. Men who mean just what they say. The brave men of the Green Beret."[1]. Conservative (talk) 01:27, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

I'm trying to understand the relevance of your comment, Conservative. Do you mean that you rarely notice that there are more letters in the acronym? Aside from 'I never noticed this matter because I rarely think of homosexuality' the rest of the comment is entirely a non sequitur. Please refrain from making word salad-style comments. Thanks. Vive Liberté! 10:55, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

Vive Liberté!, I know leftists have a hard time understanding things. For example, Donald Trump's winning of the 2016 election caught them completely by surprise.

And time is running out for liberals to understand things as can be seen HERE. Homosexuality is one of the many achilles' heels of liberalism. They are unable to have kids. Conservative (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

I struggle to understand your logic. Good day, sir. Has it never crossed your mind that A) not all leftists are gay or B) that adoption and artificial insemination exist? And no, his winning, while unfortunate, is not a surprise, as we keep finding out just how much meddling Russia did in the last election. Vive Liberté! 17:26, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

Those darn Russians. They caused Hillary Clinton to: have a private email server; accept the unfair favoring of her candidacy by the DNC; get the debate questions before a presidential debate without telling the public about it; accept big speaking fees from special interests; engage in bribery via the Clinton Foundation; not have a compelling vision for her candidacy which she could communicate to the public and give inane speeches that did not attract big crowds.

She would have gotten away with all these things, if it weren't for weren't for those meddling Russians!Conservative (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2017 (EDT)

Good thing they may or may not have elected a billionaire racist misogynist in her place. Good thing that person who they may or may not have gotten elected is tearing the country apart. Good thing he's slashing taxes, giving breaks to the wealthy, and destroying health care. Good thing his infrastructure plan is underwhelming. Good thing he's deporting lots of good, hard-working people because they weren't born in America. Good thing that he's inflaming tensions in the Middle East. Good thing he's inflaming tensions with China. The Russians may or may not have elected one helluva choice for POTUS. Anyway, this is pretty off-topic, so we can either move this discussion or just stop. Vive Liberté! 22:25, 17 June 2017 (EDT)