Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal trap"
From Conservapedia
(In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Some lead (by coining or popularizing terms) some (like professors) follow. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:41, 17 January 2010 (EST) | :Some lead (by coining or popularizing terms) some (like professors) follow. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:41, 17 January 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's ''often'' dimwitted, but not always so. And even the smartest person in the world can be deceived by a [[liberal trap]] if he's in a hurry or thinking about something else. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:59, 17 January 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:59, January 17, 2010
Well if it's dimwitted, any conservative can handle it. :) This is not a term in common usage. RJJensen 11:51, 17 January 2010 (EST)
- Some lead (by coining or popularizing terms) some (like professors) follow. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 12:41, 17 January 2010 (EST)
It's often dimwitted, but not always so. And even the smartest person in the world can be deceived by a liberal trap if he's in a hurry or thinking about something else.
In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there.--Andy Schlafly 13:59, 17 January 2010 (EST)
