Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal trap"
From Conservapedia
(In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there) |
(dimwitted traps) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:59, 17 January 2010 (EST) | In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:59, 17 January 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | ::I recommend dropping "dimwitted." --as in the Palin example, saying she fell into a dimwitted trap has CP making her look stupid. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 14:25, 17 January 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:25, January 17, 2010
Well if it's dimwitted, any conservative can handle it. :) This is not a term in common usage. RJJensen 11:51, 17 January 2010 (EST)
- Some lead (by coining or popularizing terms) some (like professors) follow. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 12:41, 17 January 2010 (EST)
It's often dimwitted, but not always so. And even the smartest person in the world can be deceived by a liberal trap if he's in a hurry or thinking about something else.
In response to the concern about whether it's in common usage, a quick search on Google turns up over 5600 links to the term. So it's out there.--Andy Schlafly 13:59, 17 January 2010 (EST)
- I recommend dropping "dimwitted." --as in the Palin example, saying she fell into a dimwitted trap has CP making her look stupid. RJJensen 14:25, 17 January 2010 (EST)
