Last modified on November 5, 2012, at 18:30

Talk:Limousine liberal

This is the current revision of Talk:Limousine liberal as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 18:30, November 5, 2012. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Return to "Limousine liberal" page.

If a wealthy person supports social welfare, how does that make them a hypocrite? Eoinc 13:21, 15 August 2008 (EDT)

I can understand the contradiction in the case of the "Champagne Socialists" (I have also heard them referred to as "Smoked Salmon Socialists", which I think is a wittier name), because socialists claim to be in favour of spreading wealth equally among all people rather than having an elite wealthy class. But in the case of limousine liberals, I just don't see where the hypocrisy lies. Can't someone support giving money to the poor and be wealthy? Eoinc 13:27, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
The hypocrisy is in how the limousine liberals want to redistribute wealth from others to the poor, and actually oppose policies that would help upward mobility by the poor.--Andy Schlafly 00:39, 22 March 2011 (EDT)

Democrats

Should we mention that the Democratic Party is full of limousine liberals and the Democrats are people fooled by the limousine liberals? Conservapedian123 14:21, 20 March 2011 (EDT)

Please edit the entry as you think best.--Andy Schlafly 00:36, 22 March 2011 (EDT)

Naming Limousine Liberals

With permission, I would like to research and find a few of these Limo Liberals or LL's to list on the page. I already have one, Michael Moore. MHarris

Doesn't this apply to Mitt?

Romney claims to care about the plight of the impoverished yet he is extremely wealthy and has most certainly taken many a limousine ride. He also has made money at Bain by putting many American employees out of work. It's pretty obvious to any reasonable person that he doesn't really care about the poor-there was in fact video evidence (47% video) that caught him bluntly admitting this. Just saying, you can't attribute this kind of phoniness only to liberals when it exists on both sides of the spectrum--in republican nominee for President, in this example.--WalterW 12:55, 5 November 2012 (EST)

No, because Mitt is not a liberal. Mitt wants others to have the same opportunity for wealth that he has had. Limousine liberals, in contrast, want higher taxes that have the effect of limiting the acquisition of wealth.--Andy Schlafly 13:30, 5 November 2012 (EST)