If a wealthy person supports social welfare, how does that make them a hypocrite? Eoinc 13:21, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
- I can understand the contradiction in the case of the "Champagne Socialists" (I have also heard them referred to as "Smoked Salmon Socialists", which I think is a wittier name), because socialists claim to be in favour of spreading wealth equally among all people rather than having an elite wealthy class. But in the case of limousine liberals, I just don't see where the hypocrisy lies. Can't someone support giving money to the poor and be wealthy? Eoinc 13:27, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
- The hypocrisy is in how the limousine liberals want to redistribute wealth from others to the poor, and actually oppose policies that would help upward mobility by the poor.--Andy Schlafly 00:39, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
Democrats
Should we mention that the Democratic Party is full of limousine liberals and the Democrats are people fooled by the limousine liberals? Conservapedian123 14:21, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
- Please edit the entry as you think best.--Andy Schlafly 00:36, 22 March 2011 (EDT)